[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YJpePAHS3EDw6PK1@rikard>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 12:36:44 +0200
From: Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@...il.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
linux-m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-SH <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexey Klimov <aklimov@...hat.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Jianpeng Ma <jianpeng.ma@...el.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] tools: sync lib/find_bit implementation
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 10:28:50AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 12:51:58AM +0200, Rikard Falkeborn wrote:
> > On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 06:44:44PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > Does the following work for you? For simplicity, I copied__is_constexpr from
> > include/linux/minmax.h (which isn't available in tools/). A proper patch
> > would reuse __is_constexpr (possibly refactoring it to a separate
> > header since bits.h including minmax.h for that only seems smelly)
>
> I think we need to have it in something like compiler.h (top level). Under
> 'top level' I meant something with the function as of compiler.h but with
> Linuxisms rather than compiler attributes or so.
Right. Will you send a patch, or do you want me to?
It would be good to get confirmation that __is_constexpr solves the
build failure.
>
> Separate header for the (single) macro is too much...
>
Agreed.
> > and fix
> > bits.h in the kernel header as well, to keep the files in sync.
>
> Right.
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>
With Best Regards,
Rikard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists