linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 11/12] tools: sync lib/find

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YJoyMrqRtB3GSAny@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 11 May 2021 10:28:50 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@...il.com>
Cc:     Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
        Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        linux-m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
        Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-SH <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexey Klimov <aklimov@...hat.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
        Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Jianpeng Ma <jianpeng.ma@...el.com>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
        Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>,
        Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
        Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] tools: sync lib/find_bit implementation

On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 12:51:58AM +0200, Rikard Falkeborn wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 06:44:44PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

...

> Does the following work for you? For simplicity, I copied__is_constexpr from
> include/linux/minmax.h (which isn't available in tools/). A proper patch
> would reuse __is_constexpr (possibly refactoring it to a separate
> header since bits.h including minmax.h for that only seems smelly)

I think we need to have it in something like compiler.h (top level). Under
'top level' I meant something with the function as of compiler.h but with
Linuxisms rather than compiler attributes or so.

Separate header for the (single) macro is too much...

> and fix
> bits.h in the kernel header as well, to keep the files in sync.

Right.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko