linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/6] x86/irq: merge common code in DEFINE_IDTENTRY_SYSVEC[

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87lf8lfizj.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:   Tue, 11 May 2021 16:22:24 +0200
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc:     Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@....com>, Mike Travis <mike.travis@....com>,
        Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@....com>,
        Russ Anderson <russ.anderson@....com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin \(Intel\)" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] x86/irq: merge common code in DEFINE_IDTENTRY_SYSVEC[_SIMPLE]

On Mon, May 10 2021 at 17:55, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> +/**
> + * IDTENTRY_INVOKE_SYSVEC - Common code for system vector IDT entry points
> + * @what:	What should be called
> + *
> + * Common code for DEFINE_IDTENTRY_SYSVEC and _SYSVEC_SIMPLE
> + */
> +#define IDTENTRY_INVOKE_SYSVEC(what)					\
> +do {									\
> +	irqentry_state_t state = irqentry_enter(regs);			\
> +									\
> +	instrumentation_begin();					\
> +	kvm_set_cpu_l1tf_flush_l1d();					\
> +	what;								\
> +	instrumentation_end();						\
> +	irqentry_exit(regs, state);					\
> +} while (0)								\
> +
>  /**
>   * DEFINE_IDTENTRY_SYSVEC - Emit code for system vector IDT entry points
>   * @func:	Function name of the entry point
> @@ -233,13 +250,7 @@ static void __##func(struct pt_regs *regs);				\
>  									\
>  __visible noinstr void func(struct pt_regs *regs)			\
>  {									\
> -	irqentry_state_t state = irqentry_enter(regs);			\
> -									\
> -	instrumentation_begin();					\
> -	kvm_set_cpu_l1tf_flush_l1d();					\
> -	run_sysvec_on_irqstack_cond(__##func, regs);			\
> -	instrumentation_end();						\
> -	irqentry_exit(regs, state);					\
> +	IDTENTRY_INVOKE_SYSVEC(run_sysvec_on_irqstack_cond(__##func, regs)); \
>  }									\
>  									\
>  static noinline void __##func(struct pt_regs *regs)
> @@ -260,15 +271,7 @@ static __always_inline void __##func(struct pt_regs *regs);		\
>  									\
>  __visible noinstr void func(struct pt_regs *regs)			\
>  {									\
> -	irqentry_state_t state = irqentry_enter(regs);			\
> -									\
> -	instrumentation_begin();					\
> -	__irq_enter_raw();						\
> -	kvm_set_cpu_l1tf_flush_l1d();					\
> -	__##func (regs);						\
> -	__irq_exit_raw();						\
> -	instrumentation_end();						\
> -	irqentry_exit(regs, state);					\
> +	IDTENTRY_INVOKE_SYSVEC(__irq_enter_raw(); __##func(regs); __irq_exit_raw()); \

That's not really making the code more readable. Something like the
below perhaps?

#define IDTENTRY_INVOKE_SYSVEC(func, regs, raw)				\
do {									\
	irqentry_state_t state = irqentry_enter(regs);			\
									\
	instrumentation_begin();					\
	kvm_set_cpu_l1tf_flush_l1d();					\
        if (raw) {							\
		__irq_enter_raw();					\
		func(regs);						\
		__irq_exit_raw();			                \
	} else {	                                                \
		run_sysvec_on_irqstack_cond(func, regs);	        \
        }                                                               \
	instrumentation_end();						\
        irqentry_exit(regs, state);					\
} while (0)								\

Thanks,

        tglx