[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YJqTB5pJiRqS1yGY@alley>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 16:21:59 +0200
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>
Cc: 'Steven Rostedt' <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
'Stephen Boyd' <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
"kexec@...ts.infradead.org" <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
peter enderborg <peter.enderborg@...y.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/13] Add build ID to stacktraces
On Tue 2021-05-11 12:58:47, David Laight wrote:
> From: Steven Rostedt
> > Sent: 11 May 2021 13:53
> >
> > On Tue, 11 May 2021 12:36:06 +0000
> > David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM> wrote:
> >
> > > > x1 : ffffff93fef15788 x0 : ffffffe3622352e0
> > > > Call trace:
> > > > lkdtm_WARNING+0x28/0x30 [lkdtm ed5019fdf5e53be37cb1ba7899292d7e143b259e]
> > > > direct_entry+0x16c/0x1b4 [lkdtm ed5019fdf5e53be37cb1ba7899292d7e143b259e]
> > > > full_proxy_write+0x74/0xa4
> > >
> > > Is there any way to get it to print each module ID only once?
> >
> > If there's a trivial way to do that, then perhaps it should be done, but for
> > now, this patch series isn't as obnoxious as the previous versions. It only
> > affects stack traces, and I'm fine with that.
>
> True. Printing the id in the module list was horrid.
>
> The real downside is all the extra text that will overflow the
> in-kernel buffer.
> At least it shouldn't be extra lines causing screen wrap.
> Unless the variable names are long - hi rust :-)
Note that the ID is printed only when CONFIG_STACKTRACE_BUILD_ID
is enabled. It will be used only by some distros/vendors that
use it to download the debuginfo packages.
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists