lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210511145349.b3gzogrdhl74oq5o@bogus>
Date:   Tue, 11 May 2021 15:53:49 +0100
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:     Nicolas Pitre <npitre@...libre.com>
Cc:     Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        Dien Pham <dien.pham.ry@...esas.com>,
        Gaku Inami <gaku.inami.xh@...esas.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: add clock management to the SCMI
 power domain

Hi Nico,

On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 04:20:36PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> Clocks requiring non-atomic contexts are supported by the generic clock
> PM layer since commit 0bfa0820c274 ("PM: clk: make PM clock layer
> compatible with clocks that must sleep"). That means we can have
> SCMI-based clocks be managed by the SCMI power domain now.
>

Looks good to me, I will apply this soon for v5.14.
I will reply with details once it is applied.

--
Regards,
Sudeep

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ