[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <nnn42849-17s8-25s1-44s2-37o95p872n14@onlyvoer.pbz>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 11:05:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: Nicolas Pitre <npitre@...libre.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
cc: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
Dien Pham <dien.pham.ry@...esas.com>,
Gaku Inami <gaku.inami.xh@...esas.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: add clock management to the SCMI
power domain
On Tue, 11 May 2021, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Hi Nico,
>
> On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 04:20:36PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > Clocks requiring non-atomic contexts are supported by the generic clock
> > PM layer since commit 0bfa0820c274 ("PM: clk: make PM clock layer
> > compatible with clocks that must sleep"). That means we can have
> > SCMI-based clocks be managed by the SCMI power domain now.
> >
>
> Looks good to me, I will apply this soon for v5.14.
> I will reply with details once it is applied.
Excellent!
Thanks.
Nicolas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists