lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <162186717336.304123.2079683023194359078.b4-ty@arm.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 May 2021 15:40:31 +0100
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:     Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
        Nicolas Pitre <npitre@...libre.com>
Cc:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        Gaku Inami <gaku.inami.xh@...esas.com>,
        Dien Pham <dien.pham.ry@...esas.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: add clock management to the SCMI power domain

On Fri, 7 May 2021 16:20:36 -0400 (EDT), Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> Clocks requiring non-atomic contexts are supported by the generic clock
> PM layer since commit 0bfa0820c274 ("PM: clk: make PM clock layer
> compatible with clocks that must sleep"). That means we can have
> SCMI-based clocks be managed by the SCMI power domain now.


Applied to sudeep.holla/linux (for-next/scmi), thanks!

[1/1] firmware: arm_scmi: add clock management to the SCMI power domain
      https://git.kernel.org/sudeep.holla/c/a3b884cef8

--
Regards,
Sudeep

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ