[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <60495dd3-ea68-4db3-47ad-b7b45796bf76@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 11:21:38 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 7/7] x86/entry: use int for syscall number; handle
all invalid syscall nrs
On 5/12/21 5:09 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
>> index 1d9db15fdc69..85f04ea0e368 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
>> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
>> @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ SYM_INNER_LABEL(entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe, SYM_L_GLOBAL)
>>
>> /* IRQs are off. */
>> movq %rsp, %rdi
>> - movq %rax, %rsi
>> + movslq %eax, %rsi
>
> This is wrong.
>
> syscall(long number,...);
>
> So the above turns syscall(UINT_MAX + N, ...) into syscall(N, ...).
>
That is intentional, as (again) system calls are int. As stated in my
reply to Ingo, I'll clean the various descriptions and try to capture
the discussion better.
-hpa
Powered by blists - more mailing lists