[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87o8dfer7k.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 20:34:39 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 7/7] x86/entry: use int for syscall number; handle all invalid syscall nrs
On Wed, May 12 2021 at 11:21, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 5/12/21 5:09 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>
>>> index 1d9db15fdc69..85f04ea0e368 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
>>> @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ SYM_INNER_LABEL(entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe, SYM_L_GLOBAL)
>>>
>>> /* IRQs are off. */
>>> movq %rsp, %rdi
>>> - movq %rax, %rsi
>>> + movslq %eax, %rsi
>>
>> This is wrong.
>>
>> syscall(long number,...);
>>
>> So the above turns syscall(UINT_MAX + N, ...) into syscall(N, ...).
>>
>
> That is intentional, as (again) system calls are int.
They are 'int' kernel internally, but _NOT_ at the user space visible
side. Again: man syscall
syscall(long number,...);
So that results in a user ABI change.
> As stated in my reply to Ingo, I'll clean the various descriptions and
> try to capture the discussion better.
If we agree to go there then this wants to be a seperate commit which
does nothing else than changing this behaviour.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists