linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/6] x86/irq: merge common code in DEFINE_IDTENTRY_SYSVEC[

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 12 May 2021 10:38:51 +0200
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@....com>,
        Mike Travis <mike.travis@....com>,
        Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@....com>,
        Russ Anderson <russ.anderson@....com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] x86/irq: merge common code in
 DEFINE_IDTENTRY_SYSVEC[_SIMPLE]


* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:

> On 5/11/21 7:22 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > 
> > That's not really making the code more readable. Something like the
> > below perhaps?
> > 
> > #define IDTENTRY_INVOKE_SYSVEC(func, regs, raw)				\
> > do {									\
> > 	irqentry_state_t state = irqentry_enter(regs);			\
> > 									\
> > 	instrumentation_begin();					\
> > 	kvm_set_cpu_l1tf_flush_l1d();					\
> >          if (raw) {							\
> > 		__irq_enter_raw();					\
> > 		func(regs);						\
> > 		__irq_exit_raw();			                \
> > 	} else {	                                                \
> > 		run_sysvec_on_irqstack_cond(func, regs);	        \
> >          }                                                               \
> > 	instrumentation_end();						\
> >          irqentry_exit(regs, state);					\
> > } while (0)								\
> > 
> 
> Digging more into it, it looks like a *lot* of the macros in
> <asm/irq_stack.h> and <asm/idtentry.h> can be replaced with inlines without
> any change in functionality or generated code.

That would be a much preferred outcome ...

Thanks,

	Ingo