[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YJvgreWRNgkloeuh@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 16:05:33 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/lockdep: Correct calling tracepoints
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 09:32:02AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 12 May 2021 14:37:12 +0200
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 08:09:37PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> > > The commit eb1f00237aca ("lockdep,trace: Expose tracepoints") reverses
> > > tracepoints for lock_contended() and lock_acquired(), thus the ftrace
> > > log shows the wrong locking sequence that "acquired" event is prior to
> > > "contended" event:
> > >
> > > <idle>-0 [001] d.s3 20803.501685: lock_acquire: 0000000008b91ab4 &sg_policy->update_lock
> > > <idle>-0 [001] d.s3 20803.501686: lock_acquired: 0000000008b91ab4 &sg_policy->update_lock
> > > <idle>-0 [001] d.s3 20803.501689: lock_contended: 0000000008b91ab4 &sg_policy->update_lock
> > > <idle>-0 [001] d.s3 20803.501690: lock_release: 0000000008b91ab4 &sg_policy->update_lock
> > >
> > > This patch fixes calling tracepoints for lock_contended() and
> > > lock_acquired().
> > >
> > > Fixes: eb1f00237aca ("lockdep,trace: Expose tracepoints")
> > > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
> >
> > No idea how that happened, curious. Thanks for fixing though!
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> Tested-by: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
>
> That's embarrassing :-p
Thing is, if you look at the list copy:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200821085348.782688941@infradead.org/
things were okay. I suspect there was a conflict at some point and
resolution got it backwards because the hunks are so similar and I never
noticed :/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists