linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 5/5] usb: dwc3: qcom: Keep power domain on to support wakeup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YJxxbe9L3+VBEqno@google.com>
Date:   Wed, 12 May 2021 17:23:09 -0700
From:   Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
To:     Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>
Cc:     Sandeep Maheswaram <sanm@...eaurora.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Manu Gautam <mgautam@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 5/5] usb: dwc3: qcom: Keep power domain on to support
 wakeup

On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 01:04:43PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Sandeep Maheswaram <sanm@...eaurora.org> writes:
> > If wakeup capable devices are connected to the controller (directly
> > or through hubs) at suspend time keep the power domain on in order
> > to support wakeup from these devices.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sandeep Maheswaram <sanm@...eaurora.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-qcom.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-qcom.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-qcom.c
> > index 82125bc..1e220af 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-qcom.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-qcom.c
> > @@ -17,9 +17,11 @@
> >  #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> >  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >  #include <linux/phy/phy.h>
> > +#include <linux/pm_domain.h>
> >  #include <linux/usb/of.h>
> >  #include <linux/reset.h>
> >  #include <linux/iopoll.h>
> > +#include <linux/usb/hcd.h>
> >  
> >  #include "core.h"
> >  
> > @@ -354,10 +356,19 @@ static int dwc3_qcom_suspend(struct dwc3_qcom *qcom)
> >  {
> >  	u32 val;
> >  	int i, ret;
> > +	struct dwc3 *dwc = platform_get_drvdata(qcom->dwc3);
> > +	struct usb_hcd  *hcd;
> > +	struct generic_pm_domain *genpd = pd_to_genpd(qcom->dev->pm_domain);
> >  
> >  	if (qcom->is_suspended)
> >  		return 0;
> >  
> > +	if (dwc->xhci) {
> > +		hcd = platform_get_drvdata(dwc->xhci);
> > +		if (usb_wakeup_enabled_descendants(hcd->self.root_hub))
> > +			genpd->flags |= GENPD_FLAG_ACTIVE_WAKEUP;
> > +	}
> 
> wow, you really need to find a way to do these things generically
> instead of bypassing a bunch of layers and access stuff $this doesn't
> directly own.
>
> I'm gonna say 'no' to this, sorry. It looks like xhci should, directly,
> learn about much of this instead of hiding it 3-layers deep into the
> dwc3 glue layer for your specific SoC.

Maybe this could be addressed with a pair of wakeup quirks, one for suspend,
another for resume. An optional genpd field could be added to struct
xhci_plat_priv. The wakeup quirks would set/clear GENPD_FLAG_ACTIVE_WAKEUP
of the genpd.

Does the above sound more palatable?