linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] sched/topology: Rework CPU capacity asymmetry detection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 13 May 2021 15:01:43 +0100
From:   Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@....com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
        valentin.schneider@....com, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
        corbet@....net, rdunlap@...radead.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] sched/topology: Rework CPU capacity asymmetry
 detection

On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 03:59:21PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 02:48:32PM +0100, Beata Michalska wrote:
> 
> > > > Where:
> > > >  arch_scale_cpu_capacity(L) = 512
> > > >  arch_scale_cpu_capacity(M) = 871
> > > >  arch_scale_cpu_capacity(B) = 1024
> > > 
> > > Low, High
> > > Small, Big
> > > 
> > > But you appear to have picked: Low and Big, which just doesn't make any
> > > sense. (Worse, L can also be Large :-)
> > >
> > (L)ittle, (M)edium, (B)ig
> > I can re-arrange the abbreviations used here.
> 
> Duh, I must really be having a bad day for not thinking of Little. I
> don't think you need to change this. S,M,L would be like a clothing
> store, but steps away from the big.Little thing.
>
That's how I would prefer it - keep the 'little' things
Thanks

---
BR
B.