linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/35] tty cleanup for 5.14

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YJ1RyscrL2bNYXou@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date:   Thu, 13 May 2021 18:20:26 +0200
From:   Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/35] tty cleanup for 5.14

On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 05:04:41PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 11:18:53AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > this is again a series of various TTY cleanups. The stats say: 116 files
> > changed, 661 insertions, 2602 deletions. The major part of the removal
> > is a drop of BROKEN r3964 ldisc. The rest is mostly removal of dead
> > code, or adaption to the current tty core state.
> 
> I've applied the first 33 patches in this series.  Can you resend the
> last two after you have revised them based on the review?

Greg, could you consider dropping the three USB-serial patches from
tty-testing? They don't have any dependency on the tty changes and we
can avoid unnecessary merge conflicts if I take them through through my
tree instead.

	USB: serial: make usb_serial_driver::write_room return uint
	serial: make usb_serial_driver::chars_in_buffer return uint
	USB: serial: digi_acceleport, simplify digi_chars_in_buffer

Johan