[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YJ5NQtTdQm29dO9p@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 12:13:22 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...ts.01.org,
lkp@...el.com, ying.huang@...el.com, feng.tang@...el.com,
zhengjun.xing@...el.com
Subject: Re: [entry] 47b8ff194c: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -3.0%
regression
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 01:11:27AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> That sounds good, but two things:
>
> 1) Even if context tracking is not running, we still need to handle
> deferred wakeups on idle. But all user/guest/idle currently use the
> same function.
>
> 2) Context tracking may be running even when full nohz is not. But here only
> full nohz is concerned.
>
> So the change should rather be as follows (completely untested!).
> I rather put the static key check in tick.h in order not to involve
> deep dependencies inside rcupdate.h (especially rcupdate.h -> tick.h -> sched.h)
Compiles and boots for me, 0day folks, could you please test this makes
the reported regression go away?
> diff --git a/include/linux/entry-kvm.h b/include/linux/entry-kvm.h
> index 8b2b1d68b954..136b8d97d8c0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/entry-kvm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/entry-kvm.h
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> #define __LINUX_ENTRYKVM_H
>
> #include <linux/entry-common.h>
> +#include <linux/tick.h>
>
> /* Transfer to guest mode work */
> #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_XFER_TO_GUEST_WORK
> @@ -57,7 +58,7 @@ int xfer_to_guest_mode_handle_work(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> static inline void xfer_to_guest_mode_prepare(void)
> {
> lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
> - rcu_nocb_flush_deferred_wakeup();
> + tick_nohz_user_enter_prepare();
> }
>
> /**
> diff --git a/include/linux/tick.h b/include/linux/tick.h
> index 0bb80a7f05b9..bfd571f18cfd 100644
> --- a/include/linux/tick.h
> +++ b/include/linux/tick.h
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> #include <linux/context_tracking_state.h>
> #include <linux/cpumask.h>
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> +#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
> extern void __init tick_init(void);
> @@ -304,4 +305,10 @@ static inline void tick_nohz_task_switch(void)
> __tick_nohz_task_switch();
> }
>
> +static inline void tick_nohz_user_enter_prepare(void)
> +{
> + if (tick_nohz_full_cpu(smp_processor_id()))
> + rcu_nocb_flush_deferred_wakeup();
> +}
> +
> #endif
> diff --git a/kernel/entry/common.c b/kernel/entry/common.c
> index a0b3b04fb596..bf16395b9e13 100644
> --- a/kernel/entry/common.c
> +++ b/kernel/entry/common.c
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> #include <linux/highmem.h>
> #include <linux/livepatch.h>
> #include <linux/audit.h>
> +#include <linux/tick.h>
>
> #include "common.h"
>
> @@ -186,7 +187,7 @@ static unsigned long exit_to_user_mode_loop(struct pt_regs *regs,
> local_irq_disable_exit_to_user();
>
> /* Check if any of the above work has queued a deferred wakeup */
> - rcu_nocb_flush_deferred_wakeup();
> + tick_nohz_user_enter_prepare();
>
> ti_work = READ_ONCE(current_thread_info()->flags);
> }
> @@ -202,7 +203,7 @@ static void exit_to_user_mode_prepare(struct pt_regs *regs)
> lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
>
> /* Flush pending rcuog wakeup before the last need_resched() check */
> - rcu_nocb_flush_deferred_wakeup();
> + tick_nohz_user_enter_prepare();
>
> if (unlikely(ti_work & EXIT_TO_USER_MODE_WORK))
> ti_work = exit_to_user_mode_loop(regs, ti_work);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists