linux-kernel - Re: [entry] 47b8ff194c: will-it-scale.per_process

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 19 May 2021 13:27:00 +0800
From:   Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@...el.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...ts.01.org,
        lkp@...el.com, ying.huang@...el.com, feng.tang@...el.com,
        zhengjun.xing@...el.com
Subject: Re: [entry]  47b8ff194c:  will-it-scale.per_process_ops -3.0%
 regression

hi, Peter Zijlstra,

On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 12:13:22PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 01:11:27AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> 
> > That sounds good, but two things:
> > 
> > 1) Even if context tracking is not running, we still need to handle
> >    deferred wakeups on idle. But all user/guest/idle currently use the
> >    same function.
> > 
> > 2) Context tracking may be running even when full nohz is not. But here only
> >    full nohz is concerned.
> > 
> > So the change should rather be as follows (completely untested!).
> > I rather put the static key check in tick.h in order not to involve
> > deep dependencies inside rcupdate.h (especially rcupdate.h -> tick.h -> sched.h)
> 
> Compiles and boots for me, 0day folks, could you please test this makes
> the reported regression go away?

sorry for late.

on which base should we apply below patch?
we tried to apply upon 4ae7dc97f726e ("entry/kvm: Explicitly flush pending rcuog
wakeup before last rescheduling point") and v5.12, but both build failed like below:

ERROR: modpost: "tick_nohz_full_mask" [arch/x86/kvm/kvm.ko] undefined!

or is there any particular kconfig need to enable?
(the kconfig which we used to build 47b8ff194c is in original report
which maybe you could help have a look what we may miss)

Thanks

> 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/entry-kvm.h b/include/linux/entry-kvm.h
> > index 8b2b1d68b954..136b8d97d8c0 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/entry-kvm.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/entry-kvm.h
> > @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> >  #define __LINUX_ENTRYKVM_H
> >  
> >  #include <linux/entry-common.h>
> > +#include <linux/tick.h>
> >  
> >  /* Transfer to guest mode work */
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_XFER_TO_GUEST_WORK
> > @@ -57,7 +58,7 @@ int xfer_to_guest_mode_handle_work(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> >  static inline void xfer_to_guest_mode_prepare(void)
> >  {
> >  	lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
> > -	rcu_nocb_flush_deferred_wakeup();
> > +	tick_nohz_user_enter_prepare();
> >  }
> >  
> >  /**
> > diff --git a/include/linux/tick.h b/include/linux/tick.h
> > index 0bb80a7f05b9..bfd571f18cfd 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/tick.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/tick.h
> > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/context_tracking_state.h>
> >  #include <linux/cpumask.h>
> >  #include <linux/sched.h>
> > +#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
> >  
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
> >  extern void __init tick_init(void);
> > @@ -304,4 +305,10 @@ static inline void tick_nohz_task_switch(void)
> >  		__tick_nohz_task_switch();
> >  }
> >  
> > +static inline void tick_nohz_user_enter_prepare(void)
> > +{
> > +	if (tick_nohz_full_cpu(smp_processor_id()))
> > +		rcu_nocb_flush_deferred_wakeup();
> > +}
> > +
> >  #endif
> > diff --git a/kernel/entry/common.c b/kernel/entry/common.c
> > index a0b3b04fb596..bf16395b9e13 100644
> > --- a/kernel/entry/common.c
> > +++ b/kernel/entry/common.c
> > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/highmem.h>
> >  #include <linux/livepatch.h>
> >  #include <linux/audit.h>
> > +#include <linux/tick.h>
> >  
> >  #include "common.h"
> >  
> > @@ -186,7 +187,7 @@ static unsigned long exit_to_user_mode_loop(struct pt_regs *regs,
> >  		local_irq_disable_exit_to_user();
> >  
> >  		/* Check if any of the above work has queued a deferred wakeup */
> > -		rcu_nocb_flush_deferred_wakeup();
> > +		tick_nohz_user_enter_prepare();
> >  
> >  		ti_work = READ_ONCE(current_thread_info()->flags);
> >  	}
> > @@ -202,7 +203,7 @@ static void exit_to_user_mode_prepare(struct pt_regs *regs)
> >  	lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
> >  
> >  	/* Flush pending rcuog wakeup before the last need_resched() check */
> > -	rcu_nocb_flush_deferred_wakeup();
> > +	tick_nohz_user_enter_prepare();
> >  
> >  	if (unlikely(ti_work & EXIT_TO_USER_MODE_WORK))
> >  		ti_work = exit_to_user_mode_loop(regs, ti_work);