[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cdf1a6fd7d1cbdd19e1c50b280e95b10a9114f6d.camel@perches.com>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 08:26:25 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Marc Koderer <marc@...erer.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] samples/kprobes: Fix typo in handler_post()
On Fri, 2021-05-14 at 16:10 +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> It should use post_handler instead of pre_handler in handler_post().
>
> Fixes: e16c5dd5157e ("samples/kprobes: Add s390 case in kprobe example module")
> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
> ---
>
> v2: rebase on the latest mainline kernel
>
> samples/kprobes/kprobe_example.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/samples/kprobes/kprobe_example.c b/samples/kprobes/kprobe_example.c
> index c495664..602db3f 100644
> --- a/samples/kprobes/kprobe_example.c
> +++ b/samples/kprobes/kprobe_example.c
> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static void __kprobes handler_post(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
> p->symbol_name, p->addr, regs->status);
> #endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_S390
> - pr_info("<%s> pre_handler: p->addr, 0x%p, flags = 0x%lx\n",
> + pr_info("<%s> post_handler: p->addr, 0x%p, flags = 0x%lx\n",
> p->symbol_name, p->addr, regs->flags);
> #endif
> }
Perhaps better would be to use pr_fmt and remove all the
embedded pre/post strings.
This would change the style of the output through.
Also fix a defective format in handler_fault ending with
an 'n' that should be '\n'
---
samples/kprobes/kprobe_example.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/samples/kprobes/kprobe_example.c b/samples/kprobes/kprobe_example.c
index c495664c0a9b..5f1eb8b53c11 100644
--- a/samples/kprobes/kprobe_example.c
+++ b/samples/kprobes/kprobe_example.c
@@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
* whenever kernel_clone() is invoked to create a new process.
*/
+#define pr_fmt(fmt) "%s: " fmt, __func__
+
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/kprobes.h>
@@ -27,32 +29,31 @@ static struct kprobe kp = {
static int __kprobes handler_pre(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_X86
- pr_info("<%s> pre_handler: p->addr = 0x%p, ip = %lx, flags = 0x%lx\n",
+ pr_info("<%s> p->addr = 0x%p, ip = %lx, flags = 0x%lx\n",
p->symbol_name, p->addr, regs->ip, regs->flags);
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC
- pr_info("<%s> pre_handler: p->addr = 0x%p, nip = 0x%lx, msr = 0x%lx\n",
+ pr_info("<%s> p->addr = 0x%p, nip = 0x%lx, msr = 0x%lx\n",
p->symbol_name, p->addr, regs->nip, regs->msr);
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_MIPS
- pr_info("<%s> pre_handler: p->addr = 0x%p, epc = 0x%lx, status = 0x%lx\n",
+ pr_info("<%s> p->addr = 0x%p, epc = 0x%lx, status = 0x%lx\n",
p->symbol_name, p->addr, regs->cp0_epc, regs->cp0_status);
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
- pr_info("<%s> pre_handler: p->addr = 0x%p, pc = 0x%lx,"
- " pstate = 0x%lx\n",
+ pr_info("<%s> p->addr = 0x%p, pc = 0x%lx, pstate = 0x%lx\n",
p->symbol_name, p->addr, (long)regs->pc, (long)regs->pstate);
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
- pr_info("<%s> pre_handler: p->addr = 0x%p, pc = 0x%lx, cpsr = 0x%lx\n",
+ pr_info("<%s> p->addr = 0x%p, pc = 0x%lx, cpsr = 0x%lx\n",
p->symbol_name, p->addr, (long)regs->ARM_pc, (long)regs->ARM_cpsr);
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV
- pr_info("<%s> pre_handler: p->addr = 0x%p, pc = 0x%lx, status = 0x%lx\n",
+ pr_info("<%s> p->addr = 0x%p, pc = 0x%lx, status = 0x%lx\n",
p->symbol_name, p->addr, regs->epc, regs->status);
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_S390
- pr_info("<%s> pre_handler: p->addr, 0x%p, ip = 0x%lx, flags = 0x%lx\n",
+ pr_info("<%s> p->addr, 0x%p, ip = 0x%lx, flags = 0x%lx\n",
p->symbol_name, p->addr, regs->psw.addr, regs->flags);
#endif
@@ -65,31 +66,31 @@ static void __kprobes handler_post(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
unsigned long flags)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_X86
- pr_info("<%s> post_handler: p->addr = 0x%p, flags = 0x%lx\n",
+ pr_info("<%s> p->addr = 0x%p, flags = 0x%lx\n",
p->symbol_name, p->addr, regs->flags);
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC
- pr_info("<%s> post_handler: p->addr = 0x%p, msr = 0x%lx\n",
+ pr_info("<%s> p->addr = 0x%p, msr = 0x%lx\n",
p->symbol_name, p->addr, regs->msr);
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_MIPS
- pr_info("<%s> post_handler: p->addr = 0x%p, status = 0x%lx\n",
+ pr_info("<%s> p->addr = 0x%p, status = 0x%lx\n",
p->symbol_name, p->addr, regs->cp0_status);
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
- pr_info("<%s> post_handler: p->addr = 0x%p, pstate = 0x%lx\n",
+ pr_info("<%s> p->addr = 0x%p, pstate = 0x%lx\n",
p->symbol_name, p->addr, (long)regs->pstate);
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
- pr_info("<%s> post_handler: p->addr = 0x%p, cpsr = 0x%lx\n",
+ pr_info("<%s> p->addr = 0x%p, cpsr = 0x%lx\n",
p->symbol_name, p->addr, (long)regs->ARM_cpsr);
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV
- pr_info("<%s> post_handler: p->addr = 0x%p, status = 0x%lx\n",
+ pr_info("<%s> p->addr = 0x%p, status = 0x%lx\n",
p->symbol_name, p->addr, regs->status);
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_S390
- pr_info("<%s> pre_handler: p->addr, 0x%p, flags = 0x%lx\n",
+ pr_info("<%s> p->addr, 0x%p, flags = 0x%lx\n",
p->symbol_name, p->addr, regs->flags);
#endif
}
@@ -101,7 +102,7 @@ static void __kprobes handler_post(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
*/
static int handler_fault(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr)
{
- pr_info("fault_handler: p->addr = 0x%p, trap #%dn", p->addr, trapnr);
+ pr_info("p->addr = 0x%p, trap #%d\n", p->addr, trapnr);
/* Return 0 because we don't handle the fault. */
return 0;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists