[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gE4GC6R=FW39Xp_xiLzc0RgPGu0VJygz4gN-OOBr4YCg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 17:31:59 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/acpi: Switch to pr_xxx log functions
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 12:20 PM Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>
> * Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 9:07 AM Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > * Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Switching to pr_debug et al has two benefits:
> > > > - We don't have to add PREFIX to each log statement
> > > > - Debug output is suppressed except DEBUG is defined or dynamic
> > > > debugging is enabled for the respective code piece.
> > > >
> > > > In addition ensure that longer messages aren't split to multiple lines
> > > > in source code, checkpatch complains otherwise.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c | 118 ++++++++++++++----------------------
> > > > 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> >
> > So I'm going to take this through the ACPI tree if that's OK.
>
> Sure!
So applied as 5.14 material, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists