[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YKK5/fgD4w+TVinx@otcwcpicx3.sc.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 18:46:21 +0000
From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>,
Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] x86/bus_lock: Set rate limit for bus lock
Hi, Dear X86 maintainers,
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 09:49:54PM +0000, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> Bus lock warn and fatal handling is in tip. This series sets system
> wide bus lock rate limit to throttle malicious code.
>
> This series is applied on top of tip master branch.
>
> Change Log:
> -Set system wide rate limit instead of per-user rate limit (Thomas).
> -Thomas suggested to split the previous bus lock into warn and fatal
> patch set and this rate limit patch set:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/871rca6dbp.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de/
Any comment on this series?
The series can be applied to 5.13-rc cleanly without any change.
Thanks.
-Fenghua
Powered by blists - more mailing lists