linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] x86/bus_lock: Set rate limit for bus lock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 17 May 2021 21:01:57 +0200
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>,
        Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] x86/bus_lock: Set rate limit for bus lock

On Mon, May 17 2021 at 18:46, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> Hi, Dear X86 maintainers,
>
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 09:49:54PM +0000, Fenghua Yu wrote:
>> Bus lock warn and fatal handling is in tip. This series sets system
>> wide bus lock rate limit to throttle malicious code.
>> 
>> This series is applied on top of tip master branch.
>> 
>> Change Log:
>> -Set system wide rate limit instead of per-user rate limit (Thomas).
>> -Thomas suggested to split the previous bus lock into warn and fatal
>> patch set and this rate limit patch set:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/871rca6dbp.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de/
>
> Any comment on this series?
>
> The series can be applied to 5.13-rc cleanly without any change.

It's on my todo list already.