[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3a0ca4cc-5d5c-1cb2-8942-7f90da06e854@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 14:34:18 +0300
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To: Chanwoo Lee <cw9316.lee@...sung.com>, riteshh@...eaurora.org,
asutoshd@...eaurora.org, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: grant.jung@...sung.com, jt77.jang@...sung.com,
dh0421.hwang@...sung.com, sh043.lee@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Unnecessary code change in spin_lock section.
On 13/05/21 5:33 am, Chanwoo Lee wrote:
> From: ChanWoo Lee <cw9316.lee@...sung.com>
>
> This is the spin_lock section for cq_host, and mmc setting is unnecessary.
>
> Signed-off-by: ChanWoo Lee <cw9316.lee@...sung.com>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/cqhci-core.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/cqhci-core.c b/drivers/mmc/host/cqhci-core.c
> index 93b0432bb601..4d76c858d45f 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/cqhci-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/cqhci-core.c
> @@ -1090,8 +1090,8 @@ static void cqhci_recovery_finish(struct mmc_host *mmc)
> spin_lock_irqsave(&cq_host->lock, flags);
> cq_host->qcnt = 0;
> cq_host->recovery_halt = false;
> - mmc->cqe_on = false;
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cq_host->lock, flags);
No, we don't want anyone to see mmc->cqe_on == true and
cq_host->recovery_halt == false at this point.
> + mmc->cqe_on = false;> /* Ensure all writes are done before interrupts are re-enabled */
> wmb();
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists