[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dfb7d829-94e6-2051-8795-79402160afdb@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 17:27:07 +0800
From: tangbin <tangbin@...s.chinamobile.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: lars@...afoo.de, Michael.Hennerich@...log.com, jic23@...nel.org,
knaack.h@....de, pmeerw@...erw.net, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: iio: cdc: ad7746: Fix unnecessary check
andassignment in ad7746_probe()
Hi Dan:
On 2021/5/18 15:52, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 11:00:06PM +0800, Tang Bin wrote:
>> @@ -730,11 +730,7 @@ static int ad7746_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>> if (ret < 0)
>> return ret;
>>
>> - ret = devm_iio_device_register(indio_dev->dev.parent, indio_dev);
>> - if (ret)
>> - return ret;
>> -
>> - return 0;
>> + return devm_iio_device_register(indio_dev->dev.parent, indio_dev);
>> }
> This sort of thing is done deliberately as a style choice... I probably
> wouldn't have written it that way myself, but there really isn't a
> downside to leaving it as-is.
>
> The unused "int ret = 0;" just introduces a static checker warning about
> unused assignments and disables the static checker warning for
> uninitialized variables so we want to remove that.
>
Got it, I will send this patch for you.
Thanks
Tang Bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists