linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] clk: qcom: Add camera clock controller driver for SM8250

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 18 May 2021 13:42:02 +0200
From:   Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>
To:     Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>
Cc:     MSM <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrey Konovalov <andrey.konovalov@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:COMMON CLK FRAMEWORK" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] clk: qcom: Add camera clock controller driver for SM8250

Hey Jonathan,


> +static int cam_cc_sm8250_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +       struct regmap *regmap;
> +
> +       regmap = qcom_cc_map(pdev, &cam_cc_sm8250_desc);
> +       if (IS_ERR(regmap))
> +               return PTR_ERR(regmap);
> +
> +       clk_lucid_pll_configure(&cam_cc_pll0, regmap, &cam_cc_pll0_config);
> +       clk_lucid_pll_configure(&cam_cc_pll1, regmap, &cam_cc_pll1_config);
> +       clk_lucid_pll_configure(&cam_cc_pll3, regmap, &cam_cc_pll3_config);
> +       clk_lucid_pll_configure(&cam_cc_pll4, regmap, &cam_cc_pll4_config);
> +
> +       return qcom_cc_really_probe(pdev, &cam_cc_sm8250_desc, regmap);;

Remove a semicolon.

> +}
> +
> +static struct platform_driver cam_cc_sm8250_driver = {
> +       .probe = cam_cc_sm8250_probe,
> +       .driver = {
> +               .name = "cam_cc-sm8250",

Maybe conforming with the naming scheme of "sdm845-camcc" is the
better way to go.

> +               .of_match_table = cam_cc_sm8250_match_table,
> +       },
> +};
> +
> +static int __init cam_cc_sm8250_init(void)
> +{
> +       return platform_driver_register(&cam_cc_sm8250_driver);
> +}
> +subsys_initcall(cam_cc_sm8250_init);
> +
> +static void __exit cam_cc_sm8250_exit(void)
> +{
> +       platform_driver_unregister(&cam_cc_sm8250_driver);
> +}
> +module_exit(cam_cc_sm8250_exit);
> +
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("QTI CAMCC SM8250 Driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> --
> 2.26.1
>