linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.12 5/5] tty: vt: always invoke vc->vc_sw->con

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YKPCU8NkdoterrXA@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 May 2021 15:34:11 +0200
From:   Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:     Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
        syzbot <syzbot+1f29e126cf461c4de3b3@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Linux Fbdev development list <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.12 5/5] tty: vt: always invoke
 vc->vc_sw->con_resize callback

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 09:22:48AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 07:45:59AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 06:35:24PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 6:09 PM Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
> > > >
> > > > [ Upstream commit ffb324e6f874121f7dce5bdae5e05d02baae7269 ]
> > > 
> > > So I think the commit is fine, and yes, it should be applied to
> > > stable, but it's one of those "there were three different patches in
> > > as many days to fix the problem, and this is the right one, but maybe
> > > stable should hold off for a while to see that there aren't any
> > > problem reports".
> > > 
> > > I don't think there will be any problems from this, but while the
> > > patch is tiny, it's conceptually quite a big change to something that
> > > people haven't really touched for a long time.
> > > 
> > > So use your own judgement, but it might be a good idea to wait a week
> > > before backporting this to see if anything screams.
> > 
> > I was going to wait a few weeks for this, and the other vt patches that
> > were marked with cc: stable@ before queueing them up.
> 
> I'll drop it from my queue then.

Thanks!