[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YKuVaUJFp0K929k+@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 14:00:41 +0200
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
syzbot <syzbot+1f29e126cf461c4de3b3@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Linux Fbdev development list <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.12 5/5] tty: vt: always invoke
vc->vc_sw->con_resize callback
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 07:45:59AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 06:35:24PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 6:09 PM Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
> > >
> > > [ Upstream commit ffb324e6f874121f7dce5bdae5e05d02baae7269 ]
> >
> > So I think the commit is fine, and yes, it should be applied to
> > stable, but it's one of those "there were three different patches in
> > as many days to fix the problem, and this is the right one, but maybe
> > stable should hold off for a while to see that there aren't any
> > problem reports".
> >
> > I don't think there will be any problems from this, but while the
> > patch is tiny, it's conceptually quite a big change to something that
> > people haven't really touched for a long time.
> >
> > So use your own judgement, but it might be a good idea to wait a week
> > before backporting this to see if anything screams.
>
> I was going to wait a few weeks for this, and the other vt patches that
> were marked with cc: stable@ before queueing them up.
I have now queued all of these up.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists