[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <62DB118D-3923-42E8-B3D2-3DF98F9A84C7@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 09:17:30 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] x86/syscall: use int for x86-64 system calls
:)
On May 19, 2021 4:29:29 AM PDT, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>
>> From: "H. Peter Anvin (Intel)" <hpa@...or.com>
>>
>> This patchset addresses several inconsistencies in the handling of
>> system call numbers in x86-64 (and x32).
>
>> arch/x86/entry/common.c | 93 +++--
>> arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S | 2 +-
>> arch/x86/include/asm/syscall.h | 2 +-
>> tools/testing/selftests/x86/syscall_numbering.c | 488
>+++++++++++++++++++++---
>> 4 files changed, 508 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)
>
>Thanks Peter - this series is really nice now, and I agree that this
>inconsistency should be fixed.
>
>Thanks,
>
> Ingo
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists