[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YKT2mW0xVZltBOSh@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 13:29:29 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] x86/syscall: use int for x86-64 system calls
* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> From: "H. Peter Anvin (Intel)" <hpa@...or.com>
>
> This patchset addresses several inconsistencies in the handling of
> system call numbers in x86-64 (and x32).
> arch/x86/entry/common.c | 93 +++--
> arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S | 2 +-
> arch/x86/include/asm/syscall.h | 2 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/x86/syscall_numbering.c | 488 +++++++++++++++++++++---
> 4 files changed, 508 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)
Thanks Peter - this series is really nice now, and I agree that this
inconsistency should be fixed.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists