linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Add DT bindings for apple,pinctrl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 20 May 2021 01:27:37 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@...all.nl>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, kettenis@...nbsd.org,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Add DT bindings for apple,pinctrl

On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 7:06 PM Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@...all.nl> wrote:
> > From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>

> > > +properties:
> > > +  compatible:
> > > +    items:
> > > +      - const: apple,t8103-pinctrl
> > > +      - const: apple,pinctrl
> >
> > A genericish fallback is maybe questionable for pinctrl. That's not
> > often the same from one SoC to the next.
>
> Krzysztof raised a similar point.  It seems that Apple isn't in the
> habit of changing this aspect of their SoCs.

Rob what's your stance on this? Does it need to be changed?
Else I'll apply the patch.

Yours,
Linus Walleij