[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5612e60278566bd3@bloch.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 13:22:42 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@...all.nl>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: robh@...nel.org, kettenis@...nbsd.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
marcan@...can.st, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Add DT bindings for apple,pinctrl
> From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 01:27:37 +0200
>
> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 7:06 PM Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@...all.nl> wrote:
> > > From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>
> > > > +properties:
> > > > + compatible:
> > > > + items:
> > > > + - const: apple,t8103-pinctrl
> > > > + - const: apple,pinctrl
> > >
> > > A genericish fallback is maybe questionable for pinctrl. That's not
> > > often the same from one SoC to the next.
> >
> > Krzysztof raised a similar point. It seems that Apple isn't in the
> > habit of changing this aspect of their SoCs.
>
> Rob what's your stance on this? Does it need to be changed?
> Else I'll apply the patch.
Hi Linus,
Rob asked me to provide a description for the interrupts in response
to the v2 I sent a few days ago:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20210516183221.93686-2-mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl/
I'll roll a v3 later today for that.
Cheers,
Mark
Powered by blists - more mailing lists