linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Add DT bindings for apple,pinctrl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 20 May 2021 13:22:42 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@...all.nl>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     robh@...nel.org, kettenis@...nbsd.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        marcan@...can.st, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Add DT bindings for apple,pinctrl

> From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 01:27:37 +0200
> 
> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 7:06 PM Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@...all.nl> wrote:
> > > From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> 
> > > > +properties:
> > > > +  compatible:
> > > > +    items:
> > > > +      - const: apple,t8103-pinctrl
> > > > +      - const: apple,pinctrl
> > >
> > > A genericish fallback is maybe questionable for pinctrl. That's not
> > > often the same from one SoC to the next.
> >
> > Krzysztof raised a similar point.  It seems that Apple isn't in the
> > habit of changing this aspect of their SoCs.
> 
> Rob what's your stance on this? Does it need to be changed?
> Else I'll apply the patch.

Hi Linus,

Rob asked me to provide a description for the interrupts in response
to the v2 I sent a few days ago:

  http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20210516183221.93686-2-mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl/

I'll roll a v3 later today for that.

Cheers,

Mark