| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 09:02:44 +0000
From: "Stamatis, Ilias" <ilstam@...zon.com>
To: "seanjc@...gle.com" <seanjc@...gle.com>
CC: "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"jmattson@...gle.com" <jmattson@...gle.com>,
"Woodhouse, David" <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
"vkuznets@...hat.com" <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"mtosatti@...hat.com" <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
"zamsden@...il.com" <zamsden@...il.com>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"mlevitsk@...hat.com" <mlevitsk@...hat.com>,
"wanpengli@...cent.com" <wanpengli@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] KVM: X86: Add kvm_scale_tsc_l1() and
kvm_compute_tsc_offset_l1()
On Tue, 2021-05-18 at 23:04 +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2021, Ilias Stamatis wrote:
> > The existing kvm_scale_tsc() scales the TSC using the current TSC
> > scaling ratio. That used to be the same as L1's scaling ratio but now
> > with nested TSC scaling support it is no longer the case.
> >
> > This patch adds a new kvm_scale_tsc_l1() function that scales the TSC
> > using L1's scaling ratio. The existing kvm_scale_tsc() can still be used
> > for scaling L2 TSC values.
> >
> > Additionally, this patch renames the kvm_compute_tsc_offset() function
> > to kvm_compute_tsc_offset_l1() and has the function treat its TSC
> > argument as an L1 TSC value. All existing code uses this function
> > passing L1 values to it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ilias Stamatis <ilstam@...zon.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
> > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> > 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > index 7dfc609eacd6..be59197e5eb7 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > @@ -1789,6 +1789,7 @@ static inline bool kvm_is_supported_user_return_msr(u32 msr)
> > }
> >
> > u64 kvm_scale_tsc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 tsc);
> > +u64 kvm_scale_tsc_l1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 tsc);
> > u64 kvm_read_l1_tsc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 host_tsc);
>
> I don't really care which version is used, but we should be consistent, i.e. choose
> kvm_<action>_tsc_l1 or kvm_<action>_tsc_l1, not both. The easy choice is the
> former since it's already there.
OK
>
> > unsigned long kvm_get_linear_rip(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > index 07cf5d7ece38..84af1af7a2cc 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > @@ -2319,18 +2319,30 @@ u64 kvm_scale_tsc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 tsc)
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_scale_tsc);
> >
> > -static u64 kvm_compute_tsc_offset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 target_tsc)
> > +u64 kvm_scale_tsc_l1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 tsc)
> > +{
> > + u64 _tsc = tsc;
> > + u64 ratio = vcpu->arch.l1_tsc_scaling_ratio;
> > +
> > + if (ratio != kvm_default_tsc_scaling_ratio)
> > + _tsc = __scale_tsc(ratio, tsc);
> > +
> > + return _tsc;
> > +}
>
> Just make the ratio a param. This is complete copy+paste of kvm_scale_tsc(),
> with 3 characters added. And all of the callers are already in an L1-specific
> function or have L1 vs. L2 awareness. IMO, that makes the code less magical, too,
> as I don't have to dive into a helper to see that it reads l1_tsc_scaling_ratio
> versus tsc_scaling_ratio.
>
That's how I did it initially but changed it into a separate function after
receiving feedback on v1. I'm neutral, I don't mind changing it back.
More
opinions?
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_scale_tsc_l1);
> > +
> > +static u64 kvm_compute_tsc_offset_l1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 target_tsc)
> > {
> > u64 tsc;
> >
> > - tsc = kvm_scale_tsc(vcpu, rdtsc());
> > + tsc = kvm_scale_tsc_l1(vcpu, rdtsc());
> >
> > return target_tsc - tsc;
> > }
> >
> > u64 kvm_read_l1_tsc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 host_tsc)
> > {
> > - return vcpu->arch.l1_tsc_offset + kvm_scale_tsc(vcpu, host_tsc);
> > + return vcpu->arch.l1_tsc_offset + kvm_scale_tsc_l1(vcpu, host_tsc);
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_read_l1_tsc);
> >
> > @@ -2363,7 +2375,7 @@ static void kvm_synchronize_tsc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 data)
> > bool synchronizing = false;
> >
> > raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&kvm->arch.tsc_write_lock, flags);
> > - offset = kvm_compute_tsc_offset(vcpu, data);
> > + offset = kvm_compute_tsc_offset_l1(vcpu, data);
> > ns = get_kvmclock_base_ns();
> > elapsed = ns - kvm->arch.last_tsc_nsec;
> >
> > @@ -2402,7 +2414,7 @@ static void kvm_synchronize_tsc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 data)
> > } else {
> > u64 delta = nsec_to_cycles(vcpu, elapsed);
> > data += delta;
> > - offset = kvm_compute_tsc_offset(vcpu, data);
> > + offset = kvm_compute_tsc_offset_l1(vcpu, data);
> > }
> > matched = true;
> > already_matched = (vcpu->arch.this_tsc_generation == kvm->arch.cur_tsc_generation);
> > @@ -2463,7 +2475,7 @@ static inline void adjust_tsc_offset_host(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, s64 adjustment)
> > {
> > if (vcpu->arch.l1_tsc_scaling_ratio != kvm_default_tsc_scaling_ratio)
> > WARN_ON(adjustment < 0);
> > - adjustment = kvm_scale_tsc(vcpu, (u64) adjustment);
> > + adjustment = kvm_scale_tsc_l1(vcpu, (u64) adjustment);
> > adjust_tsc_offset_guest(vcpu, adjustment);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -2846,7 +2858,7 @@ static int kvm_guest_time_update(struct kvm_vcpu *v)
> > /* With all the info we got, fill in the values */
> >
> > if (kvm_has_tsc_control)
> > - tgt_tsc_khz = kvm_scale_tsc(v, tgt_tsc_khz);
> > + tgt_tsc_khz = kvm_scale_tsc_l1(v, tgt_tsc_khz);
> >
> > if (unlikely(vcpu->hw_tsc_khz != tgt_tsc_khz)) {
> > kvm_get_time_scale(NSEC_PER_SEC, tgt_tsc_khz * 1000LL,
> > @@ -3235,7 +3247,7 @@ int kvm_set_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
> > if (msr_info->host_initiated) {
> > kvm_synchronize_tsc(vcpu, data);
> > } else {
> > - u64 adj = kvm_compute_tsc_offset(vcpu, data) - vcpu->arch.l1_tsc_offset;
> > + u64 adj = kvm_compute_tsc_offset_l1(vcpu, data) - vcpu->arch.l1_tsc_offset;
> > adjust_tsc_offset_guest(vcpu, adj);
> > vcpu->arch.ia32_tsc_adjust_msr += adj;
> > }
> > @@ -3537,10 +3549,13 @@ int kvm_get_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
> > * return L1's TSC value to ensure backwards-compatible
> > * behavior for migration.
> > */
> > - u64 tsc_offset = msr_info->host_initiated ? vcpu->arch.l1_tsc_offset :
> > - vcpu->arch.tsc_offset;
> > -
> > - msr_info->data = kvm_scale_tsc(vcpu, rdtsc()) + tsc_offset;
> > + if (msr_info->host_initiated) {
>
> Unnecessary curly braces.
>
> > + msr_info->data = kvm_scale_tsc_l1(vcpu, rdtsc()) +
> > + vcpu->arch.l1_tsc_offset;
> > + } else {
> > + msr_info->data = kvm_scale_tsc(vcpu, rdtsc()) +
> > + vcpu->arch.tsc_offset;
> > + }
> > break;
> > }
> > case MSR_MTRRcap:
> > @@ -4123,7 +4138,7 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu)
> > mark_tsc_unstable("KVM discovered backwards TSC");
> >
> > if (kvm_check_tsc_unstable()) {
> > - u64 offset = kvm_compute_tsc_offset(vcpu,
> > + u64 offset = kvm_compute_tsc_offset_l1(vcpu,
> > vcpu->arch.last_guest_tsc);
> > kvm_vcpu_write_tsc_offset(vcpu, offset);
> > vcpu->arch.tsc_catchup = 1;
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists