[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7b2525ba7871e6b8ce3f48cfd2375804a6791a94.camel@surriel.com>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 22:12:42 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
To: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: move idle swap cache pages to the tail of LRU after
COW
On Wed, 2021-05-19 at 09:33 +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> To test the patch, we used pmbench memory accessing benchmark with
> working-set larger than available memory on a 2-socket Intel server
> with a NVMe SSD as swap device. Test results shows that the pmbench
> score increases up to 21.8% with the decreased size of swap cache and
> swapin throughput.
Nice!
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -3012,6 +3012,11 @@ static vm_fault_t wp_page_copy(struct vm_fault
> *vmf)
> munlock_vma_page(old_page);
> unlock_page(old_page);
> }
> + if (page_copied && PageSwapCache(old_page) &&
> + !page_mapped(old_page) && trylock_page(old_page)) {
> + try_to_free_idle_swapcache(old_page);
> + unlock_page(old_page);
> + }
That's quite the if condition!
Would it make sense to move some of the tests, as well
as the trylock and unlock into try_to_free_idle_swapcache()
itself?
Especially considering that page_mapped is already tested
in that function, too...
> put_page(old_page);
> }
--
All Rights Reversed.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists