[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wig4SQjBLtmFODs6oXukwrO0o5CPUVzxT2UvJM9jvwSiA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 17:17:21 -1000
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: move idle swap cache pages to the tail of LRU after COW
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 3:33 PM Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com> wrote:
>
> With commit 09854ba94c6a ("mm: do_wp_page() simplification"), after
> COW, the idle swap cache (neither the page nor the corresponding swap
> entry is mapped by any process) will be left at the original position
> in the LRU list. While it may be in the active list or the head of
> the inactive list, so that vmscan may take more overhead or time to
> reclaim these actually unused pages.
This looks sensible to me (and numbers talk!), but as Rik says, it
would probably be a good idea to move the trylock_page()/unlock_page()
into try_to_free_idle_swapcache(), and that would make the calling
side a whole lot cleaner and easier to read.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists