lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <a3d5ac5539a8d9f0423fea051a038e8bbfe10c99.1621424513.git.asml.silence@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 19 May 2021 15:13:34 +0100
From:   Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
To:     io-uring@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
        Horst Schirmeier <horst.schirmeier@...dortmund.de>,
        "Franz-B . Tuneke" <franz-bernhard.tuneke@...dortmund.de>,
        Christian Dietrich <stettberger@...ucode.de>
Subject: [PATCH 23/23] io_uring: enable bpf reqs to wait for CQs

Add experimental support for bpf requests waiting for a number of CQEs
to in a specified CQ.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
---
 fs/io_uring.c                 | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h |  2 +
 2 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 805c10be7ea4..cf02389747b5 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -687,6 +687,12 @@ struct io_bpf {
 	struct bpf_prog			*prog;
 };
 
+struct io_async_bpf {
+	struct wait_queue_entry		wqe;
+	unsigned int 			wait_nr;
+	unsigned int 			wait_idx;
+};
+
 struct io_completion {
 	struct file			*file;
 	struct list_head		list;
@@ -1050,7 +1056,9 @@ static const struct io_op_def io_op_defs[] = {
 	},
 	[IORING_OP_RENAMEAT] = {},
 	[IORING_OP_UNLINKAT] = {},
-	[IORING_OP_BPF] = {},
+	[IORING_OP_BPF] = {
+		.async_size		= sizeof(struct io_async_bpf),
+	},
 };
 
 static bool io_disarm_next(struct io_kiocb *req);
@@ -9148,6 +9156,7 @@ static void io_uring_try_cancel_requests(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
 			}
 		}
 
+		wake_up_all(&ctx->wait);
 		ret |= io_cancel_defer_files(ctx, task, files);
 		ret |= io_poll_remove_all(ctx, task, files);
 		ret |= io_kill_timeouts(ctx, task, files);
@@ -10492,6 +10501,10 @@ static bool io_bpf_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
 	switch (off) {
 	case offsetof(struct io_uring_bpf_ctx, user_data):
 		return size == sizeof_field(struct io_uring_bpf_ctx, user_data);
+	case offsetof(struct io_uring_bpf_ctx, wait_nr):
+		return size == sizeof_field(struct io_uring_bpf_ctx, wait_nr);
+	case offsetof(struct io_uring_bpf_ctx, wait_idx):
+		return size == sizeof_field(struct io_uring_bpf_ctx, wait_idx);
 	}
 	return false;
 }
@@ -10503,6 +10516,60 @@ const struct bpf_verifier_ops bpf_io_uring_verifier_ops = {
 	.is_valid_access	= io_bpf_is_valid_access,
 };
 
+static inline bool io_bpf_need_wake(struct io_async_bpf *abpf)
+{
+	struct io_kiocb *req = abpf->wqe.private;
+	struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
+
+	if (unlikely(percpu_ref_is_dying(&ctx->refs)) ||
+		     atomic_read(&req->task->io_uring->in_idle))
+		return true;
+	return __io_cqring_events(&ctx->cqs[abpf->wait_idx]) >= abpf->wait_nr;
+}
+
+static int io_bpf_wait_func(struct wait_queue_entry *wqe, unsigned mode,
+			       int sync, void *key)
+{
+	struct io_async_bpf *abpf = container_of(wqe, struct io_async_bpf, wqe);
+	bool wake = io_bpf_need_wake(abpf);
+
+	if (wake) {
+		list_del_init_careful(&wqe->entry);
+		req_ref_get(wqe->private);
+		io_queue_async_work(wqe->private);
+	}
+	return wake;
+}
+
+static int io_bpf_wait_cq_async(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int nr,
+				unsigned int idx)
+{
+	struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
+	struct wait_queue_head *wq;
+	struct wait_queue_entry *wqe;
+	struct io_async_bpf *abpf;
+
+	if (unlikely(idx >= ctx->cq_nr))
+		return -EINVAL;
+	if (!req->async_data && io_alloc_async_data(req))
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	abpf = req->async_data;
+	abpf->wait_nr = nr;
+	abpf->wait_idx = idx;
+	wqe = &abpf->wqe;
+	init_waitqueue_func_entry(wqe, io_bpf_wait_func);
+	wqe->private = req;
+	wq = &ctx->wait;
+
+	spin_lock_irq(&wq->lock);
+	__add_wait_queue(wq, wqe);
+	smp_mb();
+	io_bpf_wait_func(wqe, 0, 0, NULL);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&wq->lock);
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static void io_bpf_run(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
 {
 	struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
@@ -10512,8 +10579,8 @@ static void io_bpf_run(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&req->ctx->uring_lock);
 
-	if (unlikely(percpu_ref_is_dying(&ctx->refs) ||
-		     atomic_read(&req->task->io_uring->in_idle)))
+	if (unlikely(percpu_ref_is_dying(&ctx->refs)) ||
+		     atomic_read(&req->task->io_uring->in_idle))
 		goto done;
 
 	memset(&bpf_ctx.u, 0, sizeof(bpf_ctx.u));
@@ -10531,6 +10598,13 @@ static void io_bpf_run(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
 	}
 	io_submit_state_end(&ctx->submit_state, ctx);
 	ret = 0;
+
+	if (bpf_ctx.u.wait_nr) {
+		ret = io_bpf_wait_cq_async(req, bpf_ctx.u.wait_nr,
+					   bpf_ctx.u.wait_idx);
+		if (!ret)
+			return;
+	}
 done:
 	__io_req_complete(req, issue_flags, ret, 0);
 }
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
index d7b1713bcfb0..95c04af3afd4 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
@@ -405,6 +405,8 @@ struct io_uring_getevents_arg {
 
 struct io_uring_bpf_ctx {
 	__u64	user_data;
+	__u32	wait_nr;
+	__u32	wait_idx;
 };
 
 #endif
-- 
2.31.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ