linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] gpiolib: Introduce for_each_gpio_desc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YKYmxTSgHor0N7+y@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 20 May 2021 12:07:17 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc:     Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] gpiolib: Introduce for_each_gpio_desc_if() macro

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 12:03:42PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 10:33:38AM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 11:15:31AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> 
> > FWIW, NAK due to the non-descriptive for_each_desc_if() name.
> 
> I'm fine without this change, thanks for review!

That said, maybe in the future I will reconsider.

And feel free to amend by yourself, you can keep or drop my SoB,
I'm fine either way.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko