[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YKYnYCaoUDwjS1gL@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 12:09:52 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, Sachi King <nakato@...ato.io>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl/amd: Add device HID for new AMD GPIO controller
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 01:50:50AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 11:03 PM Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > Add device HID AMDI0031 to the AMD GPIO controller driver match table.
> > This controller can be found on Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 devices and
> > seems similar enough that we can just copy the existing AMDI0030 entry.
> >
> > Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 5.10+
>
> Why? It's hardly a regression?
IIRC the stable policy allows to backport new IDs.
> > Tested-by: Sachi King <nakato@...ato.io>
> > Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>
>
> I've applied the patch for next without the stable tag for now.
It can be pulled to stable afterwards anyway :-)
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists