[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYHxKbAwFTD=g_xWxq2wnRFC2V7NBrODVn-QDVUREfyhA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 17:09:05 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, Sachi King <nakato@...ato.io>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl/amd: Add device HID for new AMD GPIO controller
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 11:09 AM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 01:50:50AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 11:03 PM Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Add device HID AMDI0031 to the AMD GPIO controller driver match table.
> > > This controller can be found on Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 devices and
> > > seems similar enough that we can just copy the existing AMDI0030 entry.
> > >
> > > Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 5.10+
> >
> > Why? It's hardly a regression?
>
> IIRC the stable policy allows to backport new IDs.
You're right.
> > > Tested-by: Sachi King <nakato@...ato.io>
> > > Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>
> >
> > I've applied the patch for next without the stable tag for now.
>
> It can be pulled to stable afterwards anyway :-)
Nah I'll tag it back on. But it goes upstream with the rest of
patches for v5.14 in the merge window because it is not
urgent.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists