linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] kernel.h: split out panic and oops helpers (ia64 fix)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 21 May 2021 09:24:08 +0200
From:   John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] kernel.h: split out panic and oops helpers (ia64
 fix)

Hi Andy!

On 5/20/21 3:17 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 03:12:24PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> On 5/20/21 3:05 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> Note, this patch is untested. I have no ia64 compiler at hand.
> 
>> I can test it later today.
> 
> Appreciate it, thanks!
> 
> This is against Linux Next (where Andrew's patches are sitting for a while).

I just pulled linux-next and was able to build a kernel for my RX-2600 without any
problems. Since your patch is already in the tree, I assume it's correct.

Do you want me to test anything else? I can test-boot the kernel later, but I want
to avoid that now since I don't want to turn on the noisy server while at home :-).

Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer - glaubitz@...ian.org
`. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913