linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] kernel.h: split out panic and oops helpers (ia64 fix)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YKehQyAn7rgXL9Bb@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 21 May 2021 15:02:11 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
Cc:     linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] kernel.h: split out panic and oops helpers (ia64
 fix)

On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 09:24:08AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 5/20/21 3:17 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 03:12:24PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> >> On 5/20/21 3:05 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >>> Note, this patch is untested. I have no ia64 compiler at hand.
> > 
> >> I can test it later today.
> > 
> > Appreciate it, thanks!
> > 
> > This is against Linux Next (where Andrew's patches are sitting for a while).
> 
> I just pulled linux-next and was able to build a kernel for my RX-2600 without any
> problems. Since your patch is already in the tree, I assume it's correct.
> 
> Do you want me to test anything else? I can test-boot the kernel later, but I want
> to avoid that now since I don't want to turn on the noisy server while at home :-)

Nothing is required anymore, thanks for your help with testing!

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko