[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b3466420-f062-51d6-2d00-73078a2e4d7b@roeck-us.net>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 07:48:46 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Kyle Tso <kyletso@...gle.com>, heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: badhri@...gle.com, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] usb: typec: tcpm: Respond Not_Supported if no snk_vdo
On 5/21/21 6:01 AM, Kyle Tso wrote:
> If snk_vdo is not populated from fwnode, it implies the port does not
> support responding to SVDM commands. Not_Supported Message shall be sent
> if the contract is in PD3. And for PD2, the port shall ignore the
> commands.
>
> Fixes: 193a68011fdc ("staging: typec: tcpm: Respond to Discover Identity commands")
> Signed-off-by: Kyle Tso <kyletso@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> ---
> drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
> index deb8a9d01f73..d32caa875d9a 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
> @@ -2430,7 +2430,10 @@ static void tcpm_pd_data_request(struct tcpm_port *port,
> NONE_AMS);
> break;
> case PD_DATA_VENDOR_DEF:
> - tcpm_handle_vdm_request(port, msg->payload, cnt);
> + if (tcpm_vdm_ams(port) || port->nr_snk_vdo)
> + tcpm_handle_vdm_request(port, msg->payload, cnt);
> + else if (port->negotiated_rev > PD_REV20)
> + tcpm_pd_handle_msg(port, PD_MSG_CTRL_NOT_SUPP, NONE_AMS);
> break;
> case PD_DATA_BIST:
> port->bist_request = le32_to_cpu(msg->payload[0]);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists