[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YKfIct+DhpEBbaCQ@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 16:49:22 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@...rceware.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
"Bae, Chang Seok" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kyle Huey <me@...ehuey.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Keno Fischer <keno@...iacomputing.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Subject: Re: Candidate Linux ABI for Intel AMX and hypothetical new related
features
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 04:44:58PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> And we added an interface for querying x86 CPU features to glibc 2.33
> which is completely incompatible with this because it assumes that CPU
> features do not change during the lifetime of a process. 8-(
How many x86 kernel maintainers signed off on that patch?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists