lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7536875f01b0420acb88de1ea3a48c31fdb26962.camel@svanheule.net>
Date:   Mon, 24 May 2021 00:21:29 +0200
From:   Sander Vanheule <sander@...nheule.net>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] gpio: regmap: Add configurable dir/value order

Hi Adrew,

On Tue, 2021-05-18 at 03:40 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 09:28:04PM +0200, Sander Vanheule wrote:
> > GPIO chips may not support setting the output value when a pin is
> > configured as an input
> 
> Could you describe what happens with the hardware you are playing
> with. Not being able to do this means you will get glitches when
> enabling the output so you should not use these GPIOs with bit banging
> busses like i2c.

As I reported earlier, using value-before-direction breaks the GPIO driven LEDs
on one of my devices.

I've tried to use another device to test if I could reproduce this. Using the
gpioset and gpioget utilities, I can't seem to reproduce this however. Whether I
enable the (new) quirk or not, doesn't seem to make any difference.

The documentation we have on this chip is quite scarce, so I'm unaware of
different chip revisions, or how I would distinguish between revisions. As far
as I can see, Realtek's code (present in the GPL archives we got from some
vendors) set the pin direction before setting the value.

For now, I've made the implementation so that the quirk is always applied. Like
the behaviour that is implicit in the origal code. If prefered, I could also
supply a separate devicetree compatible or extra devictree flag.

Regarding bit banged I2C, glitches may not actually be an issue. If a pull-up
resistor is used for HIGH values, and an open drain for LOW values, the GPIO pin
doesn't actually have to change value, only direction (IN for HIGH, OUT for
LOW). A configuration like this would perhaps glitch once on the initial OUT-LOW
configuration. Like I mentioned, bit banged I2C is frequently used in ethernet
switches with these chips to talk to SFP modules.


Best,
Sander

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ