| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <45f761de51d514f77cc48214846c5f8f@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 10:37:49 -0700
From: Chris Goldsworthy <cgoldswo@...eaurora.org>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...nel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
John Dias <joaodias@...gle.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...ts.01.org,
lkp@...el.com, ying.huang@...el.com, feng.tang@...el.com,
zhengjun.xing@...el.com, Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [mm] 8cc621d2f4: fio.write_iops -21.8% regression
Hi Minchan,
This looks good to me, I just have some minor feedback.
Thanks,
Chris.
On 2021-05-20 11:36, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 04:31:44PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>>
>>
>> Greeting,
>>
>> FYI, we noticed a -21.8% regression of fio.write_iops due to commit:
>>
>>
>> commit: 8cc621d2f45ddd3dc664024a647ee7adf48d79a5 ("mm: fs: invalidate
>> BH LRU during page migration")
>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>>
>>
>> in testcase: fio-basic
>> on test machine: 96 threads 2 sockets Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6252 CPU @
>> 2.10GHz with 256G memory
>> with following parameters:
>>
>> disk: 2pmem
>> fs: ext4
>> runtime: 200s
>> nr_task: 50%
>> time_based: tb
>> rw: randwrite
>> bs: 4k
>> ioengine: libaio
>> test_size: 200G
>> cpufreq_governor: performance
>> ucode: 0x5003006
>>
>> test-description: Fio is a tool that will spawn a number of threads or
>> processes doing a particular type of I/O action as specified by the
>> user.
>> test-url: https://github.com/axboe/fio
>>
>>
>>
>> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
>>
>>
>> Details are as below:
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
>>
>>
>> To reproduce:
>>
>> git clone https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests.git
>> cd lkp-tests
>> bin/lkp install job.yaml # job file is
>> attached in this email
>> bin/lkp split-job --compatible job.yaml # generate the yaml
>> file for lkp run
>> bin/lkp run generated-yaml-file
>
> Hi,
>
> I tried to insall the lkp-test in my machine by following above guide
> but failed
> due to package problems(I guess it's my problem since I use something
> particular
> environement). However, I guess it comes from increased miss ratio of
> bh_lrus
> since the patch caused more frequent invalidation of the bh_lrus calls
> compared
> to old. For example, lru_add_drain could be called from several hot
> places(e.g.,
> unmap and pagevec_release from several path) and it could keeps
> invalidating
> bh_lrus.
>
> IMO, we should move the overhead from such hot path to cold one. How
> about this?
>
> From ebf4ede1cf32fb14d85f0015a3693cb8e1b8dbfe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
> Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 11:17:56 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] invalidate bh_lrus only at lru_add_drain_all
>
> Not-Yet-Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
> ---
> mm/swap.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
> index dfb48cf9c2c9..d6168449e28c 100644
> --- a/mm/swap.c
> +++ b/mm/swap.c
> @@ -642,7 +642,6 @@ void lru_add_drain_cpu(int cpu)
> pagevec_lru_move_fn(pvec, lru_lazyfree_fn);
>
> activate_page_drain(cpu);
> - invalidate_bh_lrus_cpu(cpu);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -725,6 +724,17 @@ void lru_add_drain(void)
> local_unlock(&lru_pvecs.lock);
> }
>
> +void lru_and_bh_lrus_drain(void)
> +{
> + int cpu;
> +
> + local_lock(&lru_pvecs.lock);
> + cpu = smp_processor_id();
> + lru_add_drain_cpu(cpu);
> + local_unlock(&lru_pvecs.lock);
> + invalidate_bh_lrus_cpu(cpu);
> +}
> +
Nit: drop int cpu?
> void lru_add_drain_cpu_zone(struct zone *zone)
> {
> local_lock(&lru_pvecs.lock);
> @@ -739,7 +749,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct work_struct,
> lru_add_drain_work);
>
> static void lru_add_drain_per_cpu(struct work_struct *dummy)
> {
> - lru_add_drain();
> + lru_and_bh_lrus_drain();
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -881,6 +891,7 @@ void lru_cache_disable(void)
> __lru_add_drain_all(true);
> #else
> lru_add_drain();
> + invalidate_bh_lrus_cpu(smp_processor_id());
> #endif
> }
Can't we replace the call to lru_add_drain() and
invalidate_bh_lrus_cpu(smp_processor_id()) with a single call to
lru_and_bh_lrus_drain()?
> --
> 2.31.1.818.g46aad6cb9e-goog
>
Thanks,
Chris.
>>
>> =========================================================================================
>> bs/compiler/cpufreq_governor/disk/fs/ioengine/kconfig/nr_task/rootfs/runtime/rw/tbox_group/test_size/testcase/time_based/ucode:
>>
>> 4k/gcc-9/performance/2pmem/ext4/libaio/x86_64-rhel-8.3/50%/debian-10.4-x86_64-20200603.cgz/200s/randwrite/lkp-csl-2sp6/200G/fio-basic/tb/0x5003006
>>
>> commit:
>> 361a2a229f ("mm: replace migrate_[prep|finish] with
>> lru_cache_[disable|enable]")
>> 8cc621d2f4 ("mm: fs: invalidate BH LRU during page migration")
>>
>> 361a2a229fa31ab7 8cc621d2f45ddd3dc664024a647
>> ---------------- ---------------------------
>> %stddev %change %stddev
>> \ | \
>> 0.01 -0.0 0.00 fio.latency_1000ms%
>> 0.27 ± 5% -0.0 0.24 ± 7% fio.latency_10ms%
>> 0.01 -0.0 0.00 fio.latency_2000ms%
>> 0.33 ± 8% +0.1 0.44 ± 7% fio.latency_20ms%
>> 0.01 -0.0 0.00 fio.latency_500ms%
>> 13.99 +6.0 19.96 fio.latency_50ms%
>> 0.01 -0.0 0.00 fio.latency_750ms%
>> 3.40 ± 44% -2.2 1.17 ± 46% fio.latency_750us%
>> 4.967e+08 -21.8% 3.885e+08
>> fio.time.file_system_outputs
>> 2249 ± 20% -35.0% 1463 ± 21%
>> fio.time.involuntary_context_switches
>> 305.83 ± 4% -32.5% 206.33 ± 2%
>> fio.time.percent_of_cpu_this_job_got
>> 556.42 ± 3% -33.6% 369.53 ± 2% fio.time.system_time
>> 61.89 ± 18% -22.9% 47.75 ± 4% fio.time.user_time
>> 1117924 -12.3% 980822 ± 4%
>> fio.time.voluntary_context_switches
>> 62087973 -21.8% 48559860 fio.workload
>> 1212 -21.8% 948.29 fio.write_bw_MBps
>> 33073834 -11.6% 29229056 fio.write_clat_95%_us
>> 34865152 -9.1% 31675733 fio.write_clat_99%_us
>> 4794125 +27.9% 6129631 fio.write_clat_mean_us
>> 13179671 ± 6% -10.1% 11842274 fio.write_clat_stddev
>> 310403 -21.8% 242761 fio.write_iops
>> 152653 +28.9% 196759 fio.write_slat_mean_us
>> 2139749 +9.3% 2338598 fio.write_slat_stddev
>> 2101512 ±121% -70.4% 621076 ± 15% cpuidle.POLL.usage
>> 2282803 ± 3% -18.4% 1861946 ± 8%
>> numa-meminfo.node1.MemFree
>> 43.07 +3.6% 44.63 iostat.cpu.iowait
>> 5.40 ± 2% -18.5% 4.40 ± 3% iostat.cpu.system
>> 4.27 ± 2% -0.9 3.34 mpstat.cpu.all.sys%
>> 0.28 ± 15% -0.1 0.20 ± 3% mpstat.cpu.all.usr%
>> 43381 -12.6% 37910 ± 3% meminfo.Active(anon)
>> 35262 ± 3% -10.9% 31403 ± 6% meminfo.CmaFree
>> 4195566 -14.2% 3599569 meminfo.MemFree
>> 194.67 ± 3% -17.2% 161.17 turbostat.Avg_MHz
>> 7.24 ± 2% -1.2 6.08 ± 3% turbostat.Busy%
>> 117.10 -1.4% 115.47 turbostat.RAMWatt
>> 42.83 +2.7% 44.00 vmstat.cpu.wa
>> 1285628 -21.8% 1005417 vmstat.io.bo
>> 4195839 -14.3% 3595056 vmstat.memory.free
>> 13161 ± 2% -12.2% 11556 ± 3% vmstat.system.cs
>> 30958589 ± 3% -26.6% 22710943 ± 11%
>> numa-numastat.node0.local_node
>> 11018987 ± 22% -41.5% 6444904 ± 38%
>> numa-numastat.node0.numa_foreign
>> 31025533 ± 3% -26.6% 22759513 ± 11%
>> numa-numastat.node0.numa_hit
>> 11018987 ± 22% -41.5% 6444904 ± 38%
>> numa-numastat.node1.numa_miss
>> 11040187 ± 22% -41.3% 6484419 ± 38%
>> numa-numastat.node1.other_node
>> 14095336 ± 2% -10.6% 12603755
>> numa-vmstat.node0.nr_dirtied
>> 13208199 ± 2% -11.2% 11722525
>> numa-vmstat.node0.nr_written
>> 852.17 ± 9% -82.8% 146.67 ± 46%
>> numa-vmstat.node0.workingset_nodes
>> 14563084 ± 2% -11.2% 12933874
>> numa-vmstat.node1.nr_dirtied
>> 571303 ± 3% -18.5% 465407 ± 8%
>> numa-vmstat.node1.nr_free_pages
>> 13698641 ± 2% -12.1% 12047165
>> numa-vmstat.node1.nr_written
>> 0.02 ± 25% -32.4% 0.01 ± 27%
>> perf-sched.sch_delay.max.ms.jbd2_log_wait_commit.jbd2_log_do_checkpoint.__jbd2_log_wait_for_space.add_transaction_credits
>> 6.26 ±169% -88.1% 0.74 ± 64%
>> perf-sched.sch_delay.max.ms.schedule_timeout.io_schedule_timeout.balance_dirty_pages.balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited
>> 27.33 +16.4% 31.82 ± 5%
>> perf-sched.total_wait_and_delay.average.ms
>> 89752 -15.0% 76314 ± 4%
>> perf-sched.total_wait_and_delay.count.ms
>> 27.33 +16.4% 31.82 ± 5%
>> perf-sched.total_wait_time.average.ms
>> 35.69 ± 31% -100.0% 0.00
>> perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.preempt_schedule_common.__cond_resched.down_read.ext4_da_map_blocks.constprop
>> 0.29 ± 2% +34.9% 0.39 ± 8%
>> perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.rwsem_down_read_slowpath.ext4_da_map_blocks.constprop.0.ext4_da_get_block_prep
>> 416.43 ± 2% +40.7% 585.86 ± 3%
>> perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock.poll_schedule_timeout.constprop.0.do_sys_poll
>> 29.78 -9.6% 26.93
>> perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.schedule_timeout.io_schedule_timeout.balance_dirty_pages.balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited
>> 242.41 ± 20% +65.7% 401.67 ± 13%
>> perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.schedule_timeout.kcompactd.kthread.ret_from_fork
>> 21.67 ± 25% -67.7% 7.00 ± 85%
>> perf-sched.wait_and_delay.count.kswapd.kthread.ret_from_fork
>> 4.33 ± 51% -100.0% 0.00
>> perf-sched.wait_and_delay.count.preempt_schedule_common.__cond_resched.down_read.ext4_da_map_blocks.constprop
>> 12.67 ± 30% -81.6% 2.33 ±223%
>> perf-sched.wait_and_delay.count.preempt_schedule_common.__cond_resched.generic_perform_write.ext4_buffered_write_iter.aio_write
>> 62774 -23.9% 47742 ± 8%
>> perf-sched.wait_and_delay.count.rwsem_down_read_slowpath.ext4_da_map_blocks.constprop.0.ext4_da_get_block_prep
>> 44.83 ± 3% -29.0% 31.83 ± 3%
>> perf-sched.wait_and_delay.count.schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock.poll_schedule_timeout.constprop.0.do_sys_poll
>> 14423 +11.9% 16138
>> perf-sched.wait_and_delay.count.schedule_timeout.io_schedule_timeout.balance_dirty_pages.balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited
>> 79.67 ± 17% -39.5% 48.17 ± 14%
>> perf-sched.wait_and_delay.count.schedule_timeout.kcompactd.kthread.ret_from_fork
>> 43.01 ± 51% -100.0% 0.00
>> perf-sched.wait_and_delay.max.ms.preempt_schedule_common.__cond_resched.down_read.ext4_da_map_blocks.constprop
>> 109.65 ± 6% -12.4% 96.02 ± 7%
>> perf-sched.wait_and_delay.max.ms.schedule_timeout.io_schedule_timeout.balance_dirty_pages.balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited
>> 35.68 ± 31% -22.7% 27.57 ± 5%
>> perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.preempt_schedule_common.__cond_resched.down_read.ext4_da_map_blocks.constprop
>> 0.29 ± 2% +35.0% 0.39 ± 8%
>> perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.rwsem_down_read_slowpath.ext4_da_map_blocks.constprop.0.ext4_da_get_block_prep
>> 416.43 ± 2% +40.7% 585.86 ± 3%
>> perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock.poll_schedule_timeout.constprop.0.do_sys_poll
>> 29.77 -9.6% 26.93
>> perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.schedule_timeout.io_schedule_timeout.balance_dirty_pages.balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited
>> 242.41 ± 20% +65.7% 401.66 ± 13%
>> perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.schedule_timeout.kcompactd.kthread.ret_from_fork
>> 3.22 ±203% -99.6% 0.01 ±223%
>> perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.schedule_timeout.wait_for_completion.__flush_work.__drain_all_pages
>> 0.10 ±132% -84.4% 0.02 ± 80%
>> perf-sched.wait_time.max.ms.preempt_schedule_common.__cond_resched.ext4_journal_check_start.__ext4_journal_start_reserved.ext4_convert_unwritten_io_end_vec
>> 107.54 ± 8% -47.8% 56.19 ± 70%
>> perf-sched.wait_time.max.ms.rwsem_down_write_slowpath.ext4_map_blocks.ext4_writepages.do_writepages
>> 109.64 ± 6% -12.4% 96.02 ± 7%
>> perf-sched.wait_time.max.ms.schedule_timeout.io_schedule_timeout.balance_dirty_pages.balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited
>> 35.78 ±220% -99.9% 0.05 ±223%
>> perf-sched.wait_time.max.ms.schedule_timeout.wait_for_completion.__flush_work.__drain_all_pages
>> 33.56 ± 5% -27.9% 24.20 ± 44%
>> perf-sched.wait_time.max.ms.wait_transaction_locked.add_transaction_credits.start_this_handle.jbd2__journal_start
>> 884734 ± 93% -82.5% 154904 ± 54%
>> proc-vmstat.compact_isolated
>> 10835 -12.6% 9471 ± 3%
>> proc-vmstat.nr_active_anon
>> 142479 -1.5% 140281
>> proc-vmstat.nr_active_file
>> 63543876 -21.6% 49802284 proc-vmstat.nr_dirtied
>> 9537128 +1.5% 9679184
>> proc-vmstat.nr_file_pages
>> 8775 ± 3% -9.4% 7949 ± 5% proc-vmstat.nr_free_cma
>> 1047867 -14.1% 900231
>> proc-vmstat.nr_free_pages
>> 8839312 +1.7% 8985232
>> proc-vmstat.nr_inactive_file
>> 457350 +1.6% 464520
>> proc-vmstat.nr_slab_reclaimable
>> 62565176 -22.7% 48374444 proc-vmstat.nr_written
>> 10836 -12.6% 9472 ± 3%
>> proc-vmstat.nr_zone_active_anon
>> 142503 -1.5% 140308
>> proc-vmstat.nr_zone_active_file
>> 8840847 +1.7% 8986996
>> proc-vmstat.nr_zone_inactive_file
>> 12080712 ± 17% -26.1% 8922914 ± 12% proc-vmstat.numa_foreign
>> 52344635 ± 4% -20.2% 41790589 ± 2% proc-vmstat.numa_hit
>> 52256486 ± 4% -20.2% 41702499 ± 2% proc-vmstat.numa_local
>> 12080712 ± 17% -26.1% 8922914 ± 12% proc-vmstat.numa_miss
>> 12168861 ± 17% -26.0% 9011004 ± 12% proc-vmstat.numa_other
>> 30433 ± 13% -16.6% 25366 ± 5% proc-vmstat.pgactivate
>> 2278530 -18.9% 1846941 ± 7%
>> proc-vmstat.pgalloc_dma32
>> 62368755 -21.4% 49038161
>> proc-vmstat.pgalloc_normal
>> 55006150 -26.8% 40250446 proc-vmstat.pgfree
>> 10920 ± 63% -82.0% 1964 ±119%
>> proc-vmstat.pgmigrate_fail
>> 444528 ± 93% -82.2% 79298 ± 51%
>> proc-vmstat.pgmigrate_success
>> 2.62e+08 -21.9% 2.045e+08 proc-vmstat.pgpgout
>> 42363626 -8.6% 38717997 proc-vmstat.pgscan_file
>> 41658702 -8.4% 38149115
>> proc-vmstat.pgscan_kswapd
>> 42361403 -8.6% 38717417 proc-vmstat.pgsteal_file
>> 41656479 -8.4% 38148535
>> proc-vmstat.pgsteal_kswapd
>> 82628757 -5.9% 77759594
>> proc-vmstat.slabs_scanned
>> 386745 ± 29% -49.6% 194783 ± 6%
>> interrupts.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
>> 6532 ± 30% -60.6% 2576 ± 40%
>> interrupts.CPU1.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
>> 6834 ± 35% -62.5% 2563 ± 40%
>> interrupts.CPU10.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
>> 6529 ± 37% -54.6% 2965 ± 38%
>> interrupts.CPU13.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
>> 5216 ± 35% -61.9% 1988 ± 55%
>> interrupts.CPU15.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
>> 71.00 ± 36% -61.0% 27.67 ± 62%
>> interrupts.CPU15.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
>> 5532 ± 27% -62.7% 2062 ± 52%
>> interrupts.CPU16.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
>> 61.67 ± 40% -75.7% 15.00 ± 47%
>> interrupts.CPU16.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
>> 7412 ± 32% -63.8% 2684 ± 44%
>> interrupts.CPU18.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
>> 5379 ± 36% -39.0% 3279 ± 30%
>> interrupts.CPU19.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
>> 5174 ± 25% -52.8% 2443 ± 32%
>> interrupts.CPU20.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
>> 73.50 ± 45% -54.4% 33.50 ± 80%
>> interrupts.CPU21.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
>> 7035 ± 29% -63.6% 2564 ± 66%
>> interrupts.CPU23.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
>> 6149 ± 39% -49.5% 3104 ± 19%
>> interrupts.CPU3.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
>> 248.17 ± 51% +78.6% 443.33 ± 34%
>> interrupts.CPU36.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
>> 248.17 ± 51% +78.6% 443.33 ± 34%
>> interrupts.CPU36.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
>> 509.33 ± 5% -62.0% 193.33 ± 59%
>> interrupts.CPU42.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
>> 509.33 ± 5% -62.0% 193.33 ± 59%
>> interrupts.CPU42.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
>> 6932 ± 43% -65.7% 2378 ± 18%
>> interrupts.CPU48.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
>> 5884 ± 17% -63.8% 2131 ± 60%
>> interrupts.CPU49.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
>> 5593 ± 26% -50.2% 2787 ± 27%
>> interrupts.CPU5.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
>> 5501 ± 63% -65.0% 1925 ± 57%
>> interrupts.CPU51.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
>> 5352 ± 19% -61.5% 2059 ± 43%
>> interrupts.CPU52.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
>> 74.50 ± 44% -73.4% 19.83 ± 78%
>> interrupts.CPU52.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
>> 4305 ± 22% -74.5% 1097 ± 50%
>> interrupts.CPU53.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
>> 922.33 ± 91% -67.6% 298.50 ± 58%
>> interrupts.CPU55.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
>> 922.33 ± 91% -67.6% 298.50 ± 58%
>> interrupts.CPU55.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
>> 7849 ± 42% -78.6% 1681 ± 54%
>> interrupts.CPU57.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
>> 75.00 ± 40% -74.0% 19.50 ± 51%
>> interrupts.CPU57.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
>> 6309 ± 40% -50.1% 3149 ± 19%
>> interrupts.CPU6.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
>> 53.33 ± 73% -65.3% 18.50 ±109%
>> interrupts.CPU62.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
>> 4893 ± 17% -67.8% 1575 ± 64%
>> interrupts.CPU63.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
>> 104.00 ± 58% -81.1% 19.67 ± 63%
>> interrupts.CPU63.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
>> 49.17 ± 80% -68.8% 15.33 ± 45%
>> interrupts.CPU64.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
>> 62.67 ± 61% -71.8% 17.67 ± 92%
>> interrupts.CPU67.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
>> 8163 ± 32% -69.9% 2456 ± 64%
>> interrupts.CPU7.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
>> 5163 ± 57% -64.3% 1841 ± 55%
>> interrupts.CPU71.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
>> 165.33 ± 42% +598.8% 1155 ± 85%
>> interrupts.CPU79.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
>> 165.33 ± 42% +598.8% 1155 ± 85%
>> interrupts.CPU79.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
>> 401.83 ± 42% -49.4% 203.50 ± 31%
>> interrupts.CPU82.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
>> 401.83 ± 42% -49.4% 203.50 ± 31%
>> interrupts.CPU82.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
>> 5512 ± 19% -64.6% 1950 ± 39%
>> interrupts.CPU9.CAL:Function_call_interrupts
>> 209.50 ± 35% -41.2% 123.17 ± 34%
>> interrupts.CPU90.NMI:Non-maskable_interrupts
>> 209.50 ± 35% -41.2% 123.17 ± 34%
>> interrupts.CPU90.PMI:Performance_monitoring_interrupts
>> 3763 ± 7% -34.9% 2451 ± 14%
>> interrupts.RES:Rescheduling_interrupts
>> 5.47 -8.6% 5.00 perf-stat.i.MPKI
>> 2.655e+09 -8.7% 2.425e+09
>> perf-stat.i.branch-instructions
>> 1.20 -0.1 1.13
>> perf-stat.i.branch-miss-rate%
>> 31751272 -13.4% 27505174
>> perf-stat.i.branch-misses
>> 50939566 -19.7% 40921870 ± 2% perf-stat.i.cache-misses
>> 79655814 -20.5% 63321768 ± 2%
>> perf-stat.i.cache-references
>> 13271 ± 2% -12.3% 11636 ± 3%
>> perf-stat.i.context-switches
>> 1.24 ± 3% -5.5% 1.17 perf-stat.i.cpi
>> 1.802e+10 ± 4% -17.4% 1.488e+10 perf-stat.i.cpu-cycles
>> 4.127e+09 -11.8% 3.642e+09 perf-stat.i.dTLB-loads
>> 1.992e+09 -12.0% 1.752e+09 perf-stat.i.dTLB-stores
>> 5010814 ± 4% -23.7% 3825076 ± 12%
>> perf-stat.i.iTLB-load-misses
>> 1.396e+10 -9.9% 1.257e+10 perf-stat.i.instructions
>> 0.19 ± 4% -17.4% 0.15 perf-stat.i.metric.GHz
>> 878.82 -7.5% 812.57 ± 2% perf-stat.i.metric.K/sec
>> 91.56 -11.0% 81.46 perf-stat.i.metric.M/sec
>> 3065 -1.0% 3033 perf-stat.i.minor-faults
>> 46.71 ± 3% +5.0 51.72 ± 5%
>> perf-stat.i.node-load-miss-rate%
>> 8184873 ± 4% -30.9% 5656360 ± 6% perf-stat.i.node-loads
>> 57.96 ± 2% +6.5 64.41
>> perf-stat.i.node-store-miss-rate%
>> 2001649 ± 5% -16.6% 1669180 ± 2%
>> perf-stat.i.node-store-misses
>> 1374181 ± 3% -32.9% 922555 ± 3% perf-stat.i.node-stores
>> 5.71 -11.8% 5.04 perf-stat.overall.MPKI
>> 1.20 -0.1 1.13
>> perf-stat.overall.branch-miss-rate%
>> 1.29 ± 3% -8.3% 1.18 perf-stat.overall.cpi
>> 72.84 -5.7 67.18 ± 3%
>> perf-stat.overall.iTLB-load-miss-rate%
>> 0.78 ± 3% +8.9% 0.84 perf-stat.overall.ipc
>> 46.39 ± 3% +5.5 51.91 ± 5%
>> perf-stat.overall.node-load-miss-rate%
>> 59.27 ± 3% +5.1 64.42
>> perf-stat.overall.node-store-miss-rate%
>> 45385 +15.1% 52236
>> perf-stat.overall.path-length
>> 2.643e+09 -8.7% 2.414e+09
>> perf-stat.ps.branch-instructions
>> 31606841 -13.4% 27384226
>> perf-stat.ps.branch-misses
>> 50691768 -19.7% 40727855 ± 2%
>> perf-stat.ps.cache-misses
>> 79290645 -20.5% 63040614 ± 2%
>> perf-stat.ps.cache-references
>> 13210 ± 2% -12.3% 11582 ± 3%
>> perf-stat.ps.context-switches
>> 1.794e+10 ± 4% -17.4% 1.482e+10 perf-stat.ps.cpu-cycles
>> 4.107e+09 -11.7% 3.625e+09 perf-stat.ps.dTLB-loads
>> 1.982e+09 -12.0% 1.744e+09 perf-stat.ps.dTLB-stores
>> 4988272 ± 4% -23.6% 3809139 ± 12%
>> perf-stat.ps.iTLB-load-misses
>> 1.389e+10 -9.9% 1.252e+10
>> perf-stat.ps.instructions
>> 3050 -1.0% 3019
>> perf-stat.ps.minor-faults
>> 8145509 ± 4% -30.9% 5629700 ± 6% perf-stat.ps.node-loads
>> 1993105 ± 5% -16.6% 1662627 ± 2%
>> perf-stat.ps.node-store-misses
>> 1367876 ± 3% -32.9% 918414 ± 3% perf-stat.ps.node-stores
>> 2.818e+12 -10.0% 2.537e+12
>> perf-stat.total.instructions
>> 0.79 ± 13% +0.2 1.03 ± 17%
>> perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.clockevents_program_event.hrtimer_interrupt.__sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt.sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt.asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt
>> 0.41 ± 72% +0.4 0.76 ± 18%
>> perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.ktime_get.clockevents_program_event.hrtimer_interrupt.__sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt.sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt
>> 0.00 +0.7 0.72 ± 12%
>> perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.ext4_reserve_inode_write.__ext4_mark_inode_dirty.ext4_convert_unwritten_extents.ext4_convert_unwritten_io_end_vec.ext4_put_io_end
>> 3.34 ± 12% +0.9 4.24 ± 12%
>> perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt.asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt.cpuidle_enter_state.cpuidle_enter.do_idle
>> 1.35 ± 17% +1.2 2.54 ± 9%
>> perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.ext4_find_extent.ext4_ext_map_blocks.ext4_map_blocks.ext4_writepages.do_writepages
>> 3.64 ± 16% +1.2 4.84 ± 10%
>> perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.ext4_map_blocks.ext4_convert_unwritten_extents.ext4_convert_unwritten_io_end_vec.ext4_put_io_end.ext4_writepages
>> 0.51 ± 45% +1.2 1.72 ± 10%
>> perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__read_extent_tree_block.ext4_find_extent.ext4_ext_map_blocks.ext4_map_blocks.ext4_writepages
>> 2.09 ± 15% +1.2 3.33 ± 9%
>> perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.ext4_ext_map_blocks.ext4_map_blocks.ext4_convert_unwritten_extents.ext4_convert_unwritten_io_end_vec.ext4_put_io_end
>> 0.83 ± 14% +1.3 2.08 ± 8%
>> perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.ext4_find_extent.ext4_ext_map_blocks.ext4_map_blocks.ext4_convert_unwritten_extents.ext4_convert_unwritten_io_end_vec
>> 1.49 ± 11% +1.3 2.74 ± 5%
>> perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.pagecache_get_page.__find_get_block.__getblk_gfp.__read_extent_tree_block.ext4_find_extent
>> 4.77 ± 16% +1.4 6.21 ± 10%
>> perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.ext4_convert_unwritten_extents.ext4_convert_unwritten_io_end_vec.ext4_put_io_end.ext4_writepages.do_writepages
>> 0.00 +1.5 1.50 ± 7%
>> perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__read_extent_tree_block.ext4_find_extent.ext4_ext_map_blocks.ext4_map_blocks.ext4_convert_unwritten_extents
>> 0.27 ±100% +2.8 3.03 ± 9%
>> perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__getblk_gfp.__read_extent_tree_block.ext4_find_extent.ext4_ext_map_blocks.ext4_map_blocks
>> 3.07 ± 13% +2.9 6.00 ± 5%
>> perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.__find_get_block.__getblk_gfp.__read_extent_tree_block.ext4_find_extent.ext4_ext_map_blocks
>> 0.23 ± 26% -0.1 0.10 ± 27%
>> perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.errseq_check
>> 0.23 ± 26% -0.1 0.14 ± 21%
>> perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.node_dirty_ok
>> 0.11 ± 8% +0.0 0.14 ± 9%
>> perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.io_serial_in
>> 0.16 ± 11% +0.0 0.20 ± 13%
>> perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.irq_work_run_list
>> 0.46 ± 6% +0.1 0.53 ± 3%
>> perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.rb_next
>> 0.01 ±223% +0.1 0.09 ± 46%
>> perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.ext4_cache_extents
>> 0.01 ±223% +0.1 0.09 ± 46%
>> perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.ext4_es_cache_extent
>> 0.12 ± 19% +0.1 0.23 ± 39%
>> perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.tick_irq_enter
>> 0.12 ± 17% +0.1 0.24 ± 36%
>> perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.irq_enter_rcu
>> 0.41 ± 12% +0.2 0.58 ± 10%
>> perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__brelse
>> 0.51 ± 18% +0.2 0.72 ± 8%
>> perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__pagevec_release
>> 0.00 +0.2 0.23 ± 11%
>> perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.invalidate_bh_lrus_cpu
>> 0.00 +0.3 0.27 ± 10%
>> perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.lru_add_drain
>> 0.45 ± 13% +0.3 0.79 ± 12%
>> perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.ext4_reserve_inode_write
>> 0.29 ± 10% +0.4 0.65 ± 12%
>> perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.ext4_get_inode_loc
>> 0.29 ± 10% +0.4 0.65 ± 12%
>> perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__ext4_get_inode_loc
>> 1.06 ± 15% +0.4 1.46 ± 16%
>> perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.ktime_get
>> 2.31 ± 10% +0.7 3.00 ± 8%
>> perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.xas_load
>> 4.78 ± 16% +1.4 6.21 ± 10%
>> perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.ext4_convert_unwritten_extents
>> 4.44 ± 7% +2.4 6.87 ± 5%
>> perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__read_extent_tree_block
>> 8.40 ± 5% +2.5 10.90 ± 4%
>> perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.ext4_find_extent
>> 12.63 ± 6% +2.5 15.17 ± 4%
>> perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.ext4_ext_map_blocks
>> 4.33 ± 8% +2.8 7.10 ± 5%
>> perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__getblk_gfp
>> 3.91 ± 9% +2.8 6.69 ± 5%
>> perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.__find_get_block
>> 0.23 ± 26% -0.1 0.10 ± 28%
>> perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.errseq_check
>> 0.14 ± 13% -0.0 0.11 ± 14%
>> perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__getblk_gfp
>> 0.08 ± 14% -0.0 0.06 ± 13%
>> perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.get_page_from_freelist
>> 0.11 ± 8% +0.0 0.14 ± 9%
>> perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.io_serial_in
>> 0.05 ± 74% +0.0 0.09 ± 15%
>> perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.jbd2_journal_get_write_access
>> 0.00 +0.1 0.06 ± 13%
>> perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.ext4_buffered_write_iter
>> 0.08 ± 19% +0.1 0.14 ± 29%
>> perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.ktime_get_update_offsets_now
>> 0.00 +0.1 0.07 ± 6%
>> perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.invalidate_bh_lrus_cpu
>> 0.45 ± 6% +0.1 0.53 ± 3%
>> perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.rb_next
>> 0.40 ± 13% +0.2 0.56 ± 11%
>> perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__brelse
>> 0.61 ± 11% +0.2 0.84 ± 7%
>> perf-profile.self.cycles-pp._raw_spin_lock
>> 0.89 ± 19% +0.4 1.27 ± 17%
>> perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.ktime_get
>> 2.09 ± 10% +0.6 2.67 ± 7%
>> perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.xas_load
>> 1.00 ± 10% +0.6 1.59 ± 6%
>> perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.pagecache_get_page
>> 1.36 ± 5% +1.0 2.34 ± 6%
>> perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.__find_get_block
>>
>>
>>
>> fio.write_bw_MBps
>>
>> 1300
>> +--------------------------------------------------------------------+
>> |
>> |
>> 1250 |-.++ +.+ ++. +. .++ +.+
>> +. |
>> 1200 |++ : +.+ : +.+ + : + +.++ : ++ : + ++.+ + +
>> ++.+|
>> | : + : + +.+ : :: :: : : +.+ : :
>> |
>> 1150 |-+ :: + + :: :: ++.: +.+
>> |
>> | + + + +
>> |
>> 1100 |-+
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> 1050 |-+
>> |
>> 1000 |-+
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> 950 |O+ O OO OOO OO OOO OOO OO OOO OO OO OO O
>> |
>> | O O O O
>> |
>> 900
>> +--------------------------------------------------------------------+
>>
>>
>> fio.write_iops
>>
>> 330000
>> +------------------------------------------------------------------+
>> 320000 |-+ +
>> |
>> | .++ ++ + + ++.++ .+ .++ +.+ + +
>> .+ |
>> 310000 |++ : : : : + + + +.++ : ++ : :+ :++.+ + +
>> ++.+|
>> 300000 |-+ : + :: +.+ : :: :: + : + + :
>> |
>> | :+ + + :: : + : ++
>> |
>> 290000 |-+ + + + +
>> |
>> 280000 |-+
>> |
>> 270000 |-+
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> 260000 |-+
>> |
>> 250000 |-+
>> |
>> |O OOO O O OOO OOO OOO OOO OOO OO OO OO O
>> |
>> 240000 |-+ O O O
>> |
>> 230000
>> +------------------------------------------------------------------+
>>
>>
>> fio.write_clat_mean_us
>>
>> 6.4e+06
>> +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
>> | O O
>> |
>> 6.2e+06 |-+OO O O OOO O O O O OO O O OOO OO
>> |
>> 6e+06 |O+ O OO OO OO O
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> 5.8e+06 |-+
>> |
>> 5.6e+06 |-+
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> 5.4e+06 |-+
>> |
>> 5.2e+06 |-+ + + +
>> |
>> | :: : :: .+ +
>> |
>> 5e+06 |-+ :: + ++.+ : : :: ++ : + +
>> |
>> 4.8e+06 |-+ : + + : + + .+ ++. : + : :: :++.+++ :
>> ++.+|
>> |+.++ ++ + + + +.+ + +++ +.++ + +
>> +.+ |
>> 4.6e+06
>> +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
>>
>>
>> fio.write_clat_99__us
>>
>> 3.55e+07
>> +----------------------------------------------------------------+
>> |: :: :+
>> |
>> 3.5e+07 |+.+++.++++.+++.+++.++++ ++.+ +.+++
>> +++.+++.++++.+++.+++.++++.+|
>> 3.45e+07 |-+ + :
>> |
>> | +
>> |
>> 3.4e+07 |-+
>> |
>> 3.35e+07 |-+ O O O OO O O O
>> |
>> | O O
>> |
>> 3.3e+07 |O+ O O O O O
>> |
>> 3.25e+07 |-+ O
>> |
>> | O O
>> |
>> 3.2e+07 |-+ OO O O O
>> |
>> 3.15e+07 |-+ O
>> |
>> | O O O
>> |
>> 3.1e+07
>> +----------------------------------------------------------------+
>>
>>
>> fio.write_slat_mean_us
>>
>> 210000
>> +------------------------------------------------------------------+
>> |
>> |
>> 200000 |-+O O O O OO
>> |
>> |O OO O O OOO OOO OOO OOO OO OO OO O O
>> |
>> 190000 |-+
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> 180000 |-+
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> 170000 |-+
>> |
>> | + + + +
>> |
>> 160000 |-+ :+ + .++ :+ : ++ : .++
>> |
>> | : + + : + +. ++ +.+ : + : :+ : ++.+++
>> +. ++.+|
>> 150000 |+.++ ++ + + ++.++ + +.++ ++.+ + +
>> + |
>> | +
>> |
>> 140000
>> +------------------------------------------------------------------+
>>
>>
>> fio.write_slat_stddev
>>
>> 2.4e+06
>> +----------------------------------------------------------------+
>> |
>> |
>> 2.35e+06 |-+OO O O O O O O
>> |
>> |O O O OO OO OO OO OOO O OOO O O
>> |
>> | O O O
>> |
>> 2.3e+06 |-+
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> 2.25e+06 |-+
>> |
>> | + + +
>> |
>> 2.2e+06 |-+ : : : ++
>> |
>> | :: +. :: : : + : ++
>> |
>> | : : +. +. + +. + ++ : +. : :+ + .+ +
>> +|
>> 2.15e+06 |+. : :++ + : + +.+ :: + +. : + : + +.+++
>> + + |
>> | ++ + + :: + ++ ++
>> +++ |
>> 2.1e+06
>> +----------------------------------------------------------------+
>>
>>
>> fio.latency_50ms_
>>
>> 21
>> +----------------------------------------------------------------------+
>> | O O O O
>> |
>> 20 |O+ O OO OO OO OO OO O O O OO OO OO OO O
>> |
>> 19 |-+ O O O
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> 18 |-+
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> 17 |-+
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> 16 |-+
>> |
>> 15 |-+ + + + + + +
>> |
>> | : + :: ++.+ :: :: +.+ : .++. :+.
>> |
>> 14 |+. : + : : .++ .+ .+ +. +. : : +. : : : : ++ + +
>> .++.+|
>> | ++ ++ ++ +.++ + + ++ + ++ + +
>> + |
>> 13
>> +----------------------------------------------------------------------+
>>
>>
>> fio.workload
>>
>> 6.6e+07
>> +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
>> 6.4e+07 |-+ +
>> |
>> | .++ ++ + + +++.+ +. ++ .++ + +
>> .+ |
>> 6.2e+07 |++ : : : : + + + ++.+ : ++ : :: :++.+ + +
>> ++.+|
>> 6e+07 |-+ : + :: ++. : : : :: + : + + :
>> |
>> | :+ + + : :: +.: ++
>> |
>> 5.8e+07 |-+ + + + +
>> |
>> 5.6e+07 |-+
>> |
>> 5.4e+07 |-+
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> 5.2e+07 |-+
>> |
>> 5e+07 |-+
>> |
>> |O OOO O O OOO OOOO OOO OOO OOO O O OOO O
>> |
>> 4.8e+07 |-+ O O O
>> |
>> 4.6e+07
>> +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
>>
>>
>> fio.time.system_time
>>
>> 650
>> +---------------------------------------------------------------------+
>> | +
>> |
>> 600 |-+ :
>> |
>> | + + : + + + +
>> +. + |
>> |+.+ : :+. : : :+ + .++ : .++ : +.+ + :
>> : + + |
>> 550 |-+ : : + + :.+ ++ + :.+ .++ : + : : : ++ ++.+ +
>> +|
>> | : :+ + + + ++ :: : : + :.+
>> |
>> 500 |-+ + + + + :+ +
>> |
>> | +
>> |
>> 450 |-+
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> 400 |-+
>> |
>> | O OO OO OOO OO OOO O OO OO OOO O OO
>> |
>> 350
>> +---------------------------------------------------------------------+
>>
>>
>> fio.time.percent_of_cpu_this_job_got
>>
>> 340
>> +---------------------------------------------------------------------+
>> | :
>> + |
>> 320 |-+ + + : +. + + +
>> +. :: |
>> 300 |+.+ : :+. : : + + .+ .++ : .++ : +.+ + + : .+
>> : + : |
>> | : : + .+ :+ ++ +.+ .++ : + : : : : + ++ : +
>> +|
>> 280 |-+ : + + ++ :: : : : :.+
>> |
>> | + + + ++ +
>> |
>> 260 |-+
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> 240 |-+
>> |
>> 220 |-+
>> |
>> | O O O O O O O O O
>> |
>> 200 |O+OO OOO O OO O O O OO OO O OO O O O
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> 180
>> +---------------------------------------------------------------------+
>>
>>
>> fio.time.file_system_outputs
>>
>> 5.2e+08
>> +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
>> | .+ ++ ++. + + .+
>> .+ |
>> 5e+08 |++ + ++ : + + + :+ +.+ + ++ + + + +
>> + |
>> | : + : : + + + + : : : :: :++.+++ :
>> +.+|
>> 4.8e+08 |-+ :: :: ++.+ : : :: + : + +
>> |
>> | :: + : :: +.: +
>> |
>> 4.6e+08 |-+ + + + +
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> 4.4e+08 |-+
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> 4.2e+08 |-+
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> 4e+08 |-+
>> |
>> |O OOO O O OOO OOOO OOO OOO OOO O O OOO O
>> |
>> 3.8e+08
>> +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
>>
>>
>> fio.latency_750ms_
>>
>> 0.0101
>> +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
>> 0.01008 |-+
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> 0.01006 |-+
>> |
>> 0.01004 |-+
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> 0.01002 |-+
>> |
>> 0.01
>> |+.+++.+++.+++.++++.+++.+++.+++.+++.+++.+++.+++.++++.+++.+++.+++.+|
>> 0.00998 |-+
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> 0.00996 |-+
>> |
>> 0.00994 |-+
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> 0.00992 |-+
>> |
>> 0.0099
>> +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
>>
>>
>> fio.latency_1000ms_
>>
>> 0.0101
>> +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
>> 0.01008 |-+
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> 0.01006 |-+
>> |
>> 0.01004 |-+
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> 0.01002 |-+
>> |
>> 0.01
>> |+.+++.+++.+++.++++.+++.+++.+++.+++.+++.+++.+++.++++.+++.+++.+++.+|
>> 0.00998 |-+
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> 0.00996 |-+
>> |
>> 0.00994 |-+
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> 0.00992 |-+
>> |
>> 0.0099
>> +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
>>
>>
>> fio.latency_2000ms_
>>
>> 0.0101
>> +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
>> 0.01008 |-+
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> 0.01006 |-+
>> |
>> 0.01004 |-+
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> 0.01002 |-+
>> |
>> 0.01
>> |+.+++.+++.+++.++++.+++.+++.+++.+++.+++.+++.+++.++++.+++.+++.+++.+|
>> 0.00998 |-+
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> 0.00996 |-+
>> |
>> 0.00994 |-+
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> 0.00992 |-+
>> |
>> 0.0099
>> +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
>>
>>
>> [*] bisect-good sample
>> [O] bisect-bad sample
>>
>>
>>
>> Disclaimer:
>> Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are
>> provided
>> for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or
>> software
>> design or configuration may affect actual performance.
>>
>>
>> ---
>> 0DAY/LKP+ Test Infrastructure Open Source Technology
>> Center
>> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/lkp@lists.01.org Intel
>> Corporation
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Oliver Sang
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists