[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJvTdKnU6g2H-R67G8LCs4cs0_NqnOzoKbC3J+iNGayFE5RGMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 13:37:08 -0400
From: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"Liu, Jing2" <jing2.liu@...el.com>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 21/28] x86/fpu/amx: Initialize child's AMX state
On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 11:09 PM Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote:
> If we're going to start having different states with different
> behaviors, let's make them real defines.
>
> #define XFEATURE_MASK_CLEARED_ON_CLONE ...
Probably a good idea.
However, "cleared on clone" isn't the property.
The property is that the state is treated as VOLATILE.
Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists