linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND] ARM: dts: imx6dl-yapp4: Configure the OLED display segment offset

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9add872f-0c98-3c11-ea1f-5349f0f0bed2@ysoft.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 May 2021 10:59:14 +0200
From:   Michal Vokáč <michal.vokac@...ft.com>
To:     Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] ARM: dts: imx6dl-yapp4: Configure the OLED display
 segment offset

On 23. 05. 21 5:49, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 11:55:14AM +0200, Michal Vokáč wrote:
>> The imx6dl-yapp4 platform uses a GE-LX012864FWPP3N0000 OLED display.
>> The display consist of a 128x64 OLED panel and a SSD1305 controller.
>>
>> The OLED panel resolution is 128x64 but the built-in controller default
>> resolution is 132x64. To display properly a segment offset needs to be
>> configured.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Vokáč <michal.vokac@...ft.com>
> 
> Why are you resending?  Please state reason when you resend.

I can't tell where but a while ago I read in some documentation
that if you do not get any response for aprox. two weeks you
can/should resend the patch in case it fell through the cracks.
I sent these patches in the middle of April, four weeks ago,
and have got no replies since then. So I [RESEND PATCH] these.

I totally understand that you, and all maintainers and reviewers
in general, are very busy so it may take a long time to reply.

AFAIK one does not need to state a reason for RESEND PATCH.
The word RESEND itself should explain the reason. This is not v2,
where I would of course describe what has changed.

Please correct me if my understanding of this part of the submitting
process is incorrect.

Thank you,
Michal