[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7bbfb6af534c22cd1e50f16aadd412c1@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 08:08:39 +0530
From: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck <groeck7@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: qcom: Move suspend/resume to
suspend_late/resume_early
On 2021-04-20 11:13, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
>
> On 2021-03-11 01:53, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 01:50:04AM +0530, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
>>> During suspend/resume usecases and tests, it is common to see issues
>>> such as lockups either in suspend path or resume path because of the
>>> bugs in the corresponding device driver pm handling code. In such
>>> cases,
>>> it is important that watchdog is active to make sure that we either
>>> receive a watchdog pretimeout notification or a bite causing reset
>>> instead of a hang causing us to hard reset the machine.
>>>
>>> There are good reasons as to why we need this because:
>>>
>>> * We can have a watchdog pretimeout governor set to panic in which
>>> case we can have a backtrace which would help identify the issue
>>> with the particular driver and cause a normal reboot.
>>>
>>> * Even in case where there is no pretimeout support, a watchdog
>>> bite is still useful because some firmware has debug support to
>>> dump
>>> CPU core context on watchdog bite for post-mortem analysis.
>>>
>>> * One more usecase which comes to mind is of warm reboot. In case we
>>> hard reset the target, a cold reboot could be induced resulting in
>>> lose of ddr contents thereby losing all the debug info.
>>>
>>> Currently, the watchdog pm callback just invokes the usual suspend
>>> and resume callback which do not have any special ordering in the
>>> sense that a watchdog can be suspended before the buggy device driver
>>> suspend callback and watchdog resume can happen after the buggy
>>> device
>>> driver resume callback. This would mean that the watchdog will not be
>>> active when the buggy driver cause the lockups thereby hanging the
>>> system. So to make sure this doesn't happen, move the watchdog pm to
>>> use late/early system pm callbacks which will ensure that the
>>> watchdog
>>> is suspended late and resumed early so that it can catch such issues.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
>>
>
> Gentle Ping. I don't see this in linux-next or linux-watchdog, please
> let
> me know if anything is pending from my side.
>
Gentle Ping !!
Thanks,
Sai
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a
member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
Powered by blists - more mailing lists