linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 24/28] x86/fpu/xstate: Use per-task xstate mask for saving xstate in signal frame

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 23 May 2021 20:15:24 -0700
From:   Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To:     "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>, bp@...e.de,
        tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...nel.org, x86@...nel.org
Cc:     len.brown@...el.com, dave.hansen@...el.com, jing2.liu@...el.com,
        ravi.v.shankar@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 24/28] x86/fpu/xstate: Use per-task xstate mask for
 saving xstate in signal frame

On 5/23/21 12:32 PM, Chang S. Bae wrote:
> Entering a signal handler, the kernel saves xstate in signal frame. The
> dynamic user state is better to be saved only when used. fpu->state_mask
> can help to exclude unused states.
> 
> Returning from a signal handler, XRSTOR(S) re-initializes the excluded
> state components.

If I'm reading this right, it means that tasks that have ever used AMX
get one format and tasks that haven't get another one.  Do we really
want that?  We could instead look at the actual XINUSE mask.

BTW, the current FPU signal restore code is horrific.  I'm not convinced
we want to make any changes to the signal handling until that code gets
cleaned up.

--Andy