[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210525182311.GE4005783@dell>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 19:23:11 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Min Li <min.li.xe@...esas.com>
Cc: "sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mfd v1] mfd: Add Renesas Synchronization Management Unit
(SMU) support
On Tue, 25 May 2021, Min Li wrote:
> >
> > > +/* Current mfd device index */
> > > +static atomic_t rsmu_ndevs = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
> >
> > Counting/indexing this way is generally not good/required.
> >
>
> Hi Lee
>
> Since there could be more than one devices attached to the system, I am using this counter to track the index of each device.
> How would you suggest to do it? Thanks
Why do you need to track how many there are?
We don't usually do that at all.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists