[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OS3PR01MB6593170DE2814540F6C3F900BA259@OS3PR01MB6593.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 15:20:51 +0000
From: Min Li <min.li.xe@...esas.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC: "sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH mfd v1] mfd: Add Renesas Synchronization Management Unit
(SMU) support
>
> > +/* Current mfd device index */
> > +static atomic_t rsmu_ndevs = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
>
> Counting/indexing this way is generally not good/required.
>
Hi Lee
Since there could be more than one devices attached to the system, I am using this counter to track the index of each device.
How would you suggest to do it? Thanks
Min
Powered by blists - more mailing lists