[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210525130436.GS30378@techsingularity.net>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 14:04:36 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 10/26] mm, slub: do initial checks in ___slab_alloc() with
irqs enabled
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 01:39:30AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> As another step of shortening irq disabled sections in ___slab_alloc(), don't
> disable irqs until doing initial checks if there is a cached percpu slab and
> it's suitable for our allocation.
>
> Now we have to recheck c->page after actually disabling irqs as an allocation
> in irq might have replaced it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Minor nit only -- consider adding a comment at the new_slab label that
IRQs must be disabled already.
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists