linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] doc: add a couple fixups for IIO ABI files

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 26 May 2021 17:59:08 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@....net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] doc: add a couple fixups for IIO ABI files

On Tue, 25 May 2021 14:23:51 +0200
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org> wrote:

> Patch 1 was already submitted as patch 10/10 on this series:
> 	https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/87wnrtnpko.fsf@meer.lwn.net/
> 
> However, it generated a new warning, due to a separate issue.
> 
> So, resend it together with a warning fix patch.
> 
> As these patches are independent from the other ones, I guess it
> can either be applied via IIO or via docs tree, whatever works
> best for the doc and IIO maintainers.
> So, I should leave such decision to Jonathan & Jonathan ;-)

Either works for me, but on basis I got here first.

Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>

Jon, if you'd prefer I picked these up, then let me know.

Thanks!

> 
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab (2):
>   iio: ABI: sysfs-bus-iio: fix a typo
>   iio: ABI: sysfs-bus-iio: avoid a warning when doc is built
> 
>  Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>